World Heritage as a placebo brand: A comparative analysis of three sites and marketing implications

Bailey Ashton Adie, C. Michael Hall, Girish Prayag

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The UNESCO World Heritage (WH) List is often regarded as a successful tourism brand that motivates site nominations. However, there is relatively little research dealing specifically with WH brand attraction effects, and what does exist shows conflicting results. There is a significant research gap in terms of awareness of the WH brand and its potential impact on visitation, which this study seeks to fill through a comparative analysis of three diverse case studies: Independence Hall, USA; Studenica Monastery, Serbia; and the Archaeological Site of Volubilis, Morocco. Survey data (n = 771) from these three sites were collected and analyzed resulting in three distinct clusters of visitors. One of the clusters does exhibit higher levels of awareness of the WH brand, but members of this group were not motivated by this knowledge when planning their site visit. It is concluded that the WH brand may function as a placebo, and that its importance may be tied more to political interests than economic advancement. Thus, dependency on the WH List for tourism development may potentially be detrimental for locations in the long term. The WH brand's placebo effect could result in long-term problems for both the site and those whose livelihoods depend on tourism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)399-415
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Sustainable Tourism
Volume26
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

marketing
Tourism
tourism
political interest
UNESCO
Serbia
tourism development
Morocco
analysis
world
Marketing
Comparative analysis
Heritage
livelihood
planning
economics
Group

Cite this

@article{b7d6f89de12840588094dd66c2d2c8c1,
title = "World Heritage as a placebo brand: A comparative analysis of three sites and marketing implications",
abstract = "The UNESCO World Heritage (WH) List is often regarded as a successful tourism brand that motivates site nominations. However, there is relatively little research dealing specifically with WH brand attraction effects, and what does exist shows conflicting results. There is a significant research gap in terms of awareness of the WH brand and its potential impact on visitation, which this study seeks to fill through a comparative analysis of three diverse case studies: Independence Hall, USA; Studenica Monastery, Serbia; and the Archaeological Site of Volubilis, Morocco. Survey data (n = 771) from these three sites were collected and analyzed resulting in three distinct clusters of visitors. One of the clusters does exhibit higher levels of awareness of the WH brand, but members of this group were not motivated by this knowledge when planning their site visit. It is concluded that the WH brand may function as a placebo, and that its importance may be tied more to political interests than economic advancement. Thus, dependency on the WH List for tourism development may potentially be detrimental for locations in the long term. The WH brand's placebo effect could result in long-term problems for both the site and those whose livelihoods depend on tourism.",
author = "Adie, {Bailey Ashton} and Hall, {C. Michael} and Girish Prayag",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "399--415",
journal = "Journal of Sustainable Tourism",
issn = "0966-9582",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

World Heritage as a placebo brand : A comparative analysis of three sites and marketing implications. / Adie, Bailey Ashton; Hall, C. Michael; Prayag, Girish.

In: Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 26, No. 3, 08.08.2017, p. 399-415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - World Heritage as a placebo brand

T2 - A comparative analysis of three sites and marketing implications

AU - Adie, Bailey Ashton

AU - Hall, C. Michael

AU - Prayag, Girish

PY - 2017/8/8

Y1 - 2017/8/8

N2 - The UNESCO World Heritage (WH) List is often regarded as a successful tourism brand that motivates site nominations. However, there is relatively little research dealing specifically with WH brand attraction effects, and what does exist shows conflicting results. There is a significant research gap in terms of awareness of the WH brand and its potential impact on visitation, which this study seeks to fill through a comparative analysis of three diverse case studies: Independence Hall, USA; Studenica Monastery, Serbia; and the Archaeological Site of Volubilis, Morocco. Survey data (n = 771) from these three sites were collected and analyzed resulting in three distinct clusters of visitors. One of the clusters does exhibit higher levels of awareness of the WH brand, but members of this group were not motivated by this knowledge when planning their site visit. It is concluded that the WH brand may function as a placebo, and that its importance may be tied more to political interests than economic advancement. Thus, dependency on the WH List for tourism development may potentially be detrimental for locations in the long term. The WH brand's placebo effect could result in long-term problems for both the site and those whose livelihoods depend on tourism.

AB - The UNESCO World Heritage (WH) List is often regarded as a successful tourism brand that motivates site nominations. However, there is relatively little research dealing specifically with WH brand attraction effects, and what does exist shows conflicting results. There is a significant research gap in terms of awareness of the WH brand and its potential impact on visitation, which this study seeks to fill through a comparative analysis of three diverse case studies: Independence Hall, USA; Studenica Monastery, Serbia; and the Archaeological Site of Volubilis, Morocco. Survey data (n = 771) from these three sites were collected and analyzed resulting in three distinct clusters of visitors. One of the clusters does exhibit higher levels of awareness of the WH brand, but members of this group were not motivated by this knowledge when planning their site visit. It is concluded that the WH brand may function as a placebo, and that its importance may be tied more to political interests than economic advancement. Thus, dependency on the WH List for tourism development may potentially be detrimental for locations in the long term. The WH brand's placebo effect could result in long-term problems for both the site and those whose livelihoods depend on tourism.

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 399

EP - 415

JO - Journal of Sustainable Tourism

JF - Journal of Sustainable Tourism

SN - 0966-9582

IS - 3

ER -