Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews

Patricia J Lucas, Janis Baird, Lisa Arai, Catherine Law, Helen M Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The inclusion of qualitative studies in systematic reviews poses methodological challenges. This paper presents worked examples of two methods of data synthesis (textual narrative and thematic), used in relation to one review, with the aim of enabling researchers to consider the strength of different approaches.

METHODS: A systematic review of lay perspectives of infant size and growth was conducted, locating 19 studies (including both qualitative and quantitative). The data extracted from these were synthesised using both a textual narrative and a thematic synthesis.

RESULTS: The processes of both methods are presented, showing a stepwise progression to the final synthesis. Both methods led us to similar conclusions about lay views toward infant size and growth. Differences between methods lie in the way they dealt with study quality and heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION: On the basis of the work reported here, we consider textual narrative and thematic synthesis have strengths and weaknesses in relation to different research questions. Thematic synthesis holds most potential for hypothesis generation, but may obscure heterogeneity and quality appraisal. Textual narrative synthesis is better able to describe the scope of existing research and account for the strength of evidence, but is less good at identifying commonality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Qualitative Research
Growth
Research
Research Personnel

Cite this

Lucas, Patricia J ; Baird, Janis ; Arai, Lisa ; Law, Catherine ; Roberts, Helen M. / Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. In: BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2007 ; Vol. 7. pp. 4.
@article{53c4ac525bb247839dc832f7735b906c,
title = "Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The inclusion of qualitative studies in systematic reviews poses methodological challenges. This paper presents worked examples of two methods of data synthesis (textual narrative and thematic), used in relation to one review, with the aim of enabling researchers to consider the strength of different approaches.METHODS: A systematic review of lay perspectives of infant size and growth was conducted, locating 19 studies (including both qualitative and quantitative). The data extracted from these were synthesised using both a textual narrative and a thematic synthesis.RESULTS: The processes of both methods are presented, showing a stepwise progression to the final synthesis. Both methods led us to similar conclusions about lay views toward infant size and growth. Differences between methods lie in the way they dealt with study quality and heterogeneity.CONCLUSION: On the basis of the work reported here, we consider textual narrative and thematic synthesis have strengths and weaknesses in relation to different research questions. Thematic synthesis holds most potential for hypothesis generation, but may obscure heterogeneity and quality appraisal. Textual narrative synthesis is better able to describe the scope of existing research and account for the strength of evidence, but is less good at identifying commonality.",
author = "Lucas, {Patricia J} and Janis Baird and Lisa Arai and Catherine Law and Roberts, {Helen M}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2288-7-4",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "4",
journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. / Lucas, Patricia J; Baird, Janis; Arai, Lisa; Law, Catherine; Roberts, Helen M.

In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 7, 15.01.2007, p. 4.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews

AU - Lucas, Patricia J

AU - Baird, Janis

AU - Arai, Lisa

AU - Law, Catherine

AU - Roberts, Helen M

PY - 2007/1/15

Y1 - 2007/1/15

N2 - BACKGROUND: The inclusion of qualitative studies in systematic reviews poses methodological challenges. This paper presents worked examples of two methods of data synthesis (textual narrative and thematic), used in relation to one review, with the aim of enabling researchers to consider the strength of different approaches.METHODS: A systematic review of lay perspectives of infant size and growth was conducted, locating 19 studies (including both qualitative and quantitative). The data extracted from these were synthesised using both a textual narrative and a thematic synthesis.RESULTS: The processes of both methods are presented, showing a stepwise progression to the final synthesis. Both methods led us to similar conclusions about lay views toward infant size and growth. Differences between methods lie in the way they dealt with study quality and heterogeneity.CONCLUSION: On the basis of the work reported here, we consider textual narrative and thematic synthesis have strengths and weaknesses in relation to different research questions. Thematic synthesis holds most potential for hypothesis generation, but may obscure heterogeneity and quality appraisal. Textual narrative synthesis is better able to describe the scope of existing research and account for the strength of evidence, but is less good at identifying commonality.

AB - BACKGROUND: The inclusion of qualitative studies in systematic reviews poses methodological challenges. This paper presents worked examples of two methods of data synthesis (textual narrative and thematic), used in relation to one review, with the aim of enabling researchers to consider the strength of different approaches.METHODS: A systematic review of lay perspectives of infant size and growth was conducted, locating 19 studies (including both qualitative and quantitative). The data extracted from these were synthesised using both a textual narrative and a thematic synthesis.RESULTS: The processes of both methods are presented, showing a stepwise progression to the final synthesis. Both methods led us to similar conclusions about lay views toward infant size and growth. Differences between methods lie in the way they dealt with study quality and heterogeneity.CONCLUSION: On the basis of the work reported here, we consider textual narrative and thematic synthesis have strengths and weaknesses in relation to different research questions. Thematic synthesis holds most potential for hypothesis generation, but may obscure heterogeneity and quality appraisal. Textual narrative synthesis is better able to describe the scope of existing research and account for the strength of evidence, but is less good at identifying commonality.

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2288-7-4

DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-7-4

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 4

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

ER -