Two Temporal Single System Interpretation of Marx Calculations of the MELT

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Far too, often articles concerning the Temporal Single System Interpretation (TSSI) of Marx simply attempt to dismiss this interpretation of Marx, which frees his value theory from false allegations of inconsistency and redundancy, on the spurious grounds of its difference to ‘Marxist’ approaches that are influenced by the methods of ‘mainstream’ economics, such as simultaneous calculation of prices and values. As, sadly, critics of the TSSI outnumber its supporters, most journals insist that articles supporting the TSSI should follow/address the agenda of the TSSI’s critics. This ‘non-debate’ has held back attempts to explore the TSSI. In Potts (2011a) I noted for the first time that there is a difference between Kliman’s and Freeman’s methods of valuing commodities in the presence of stocks of commodities. I concluded that this difference of approach indicates how research informed by the TSSI of Marx is not a matter of following a particular dogma, but rather is an open and exciting route to attempting to apply Marx’s analysis of capitalism to understanding the world today. Potts (2011a) is not widely known as the electronic journal Critique of Political Economy, sadly, did not continue beyond its first issue. So in this article I shall repeat my analysis, focusing on how Freeman’s and Kliman’s different methods lead to different calculations of the monetary expression of labour-time (MELT).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-122
Number of pages28
JournalMarxism 21
Volume13
Issue numberNo. 2, Summer
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Labor
Karl Marx
Commodities
Capitalism
Inconsistency
Political economy
Agenda
Mainstream economics
Value theory
Redundancy

Cite this

@article{60515c6a1a9d405d94db2e3fa2dd7ddc,
title = "Two Temporal Single System Interpretation of Marx Calculations of the MELT",
abstract = "Far too, often articles concerning the Temporal Single System Interpretation (TSSI) of Marx simply attempt to dismiss this interpretation of Marx, which frees his value theory from false allegations of inconsistency and redundancy, on the spurious grounds of its difference to ‘Marxist’ approaches that are influenced by the methods of ‘mainstream’ economics, such as simultaneous calculation of prices and values. As, sadly, critics of the TSSI outnumber its supporters, most journals insist that articles supporting the TSSI should follow/address the agenda of the TSSI’s critics. This ‘non-debate’ has held back attempts to explore the TSSI. In Potts (2011a) I noted for the first time that there is a difference between Kliman’s and Freeman’s methods of valuing commodities in the presence of stocks of commodities. I concluded that this difference of approach indicates how research informed by the TSSI of Marx is not a matter of following a particular dogma, but rather is an open and exciting route to attempting to apply Marx’s analysis of capitalism to understanding the world today. Potts (2011a) is not widely known as the electronic journal Critique of Political Economy, sadly, did not continue beyond its first issue. So in this article I shall repeat my analysis, focusing on how Freeman’s and Kliman’s different methods lead to different calculations of the monetary expression of labour-time (MELT).",
author = "Nicholas Potts",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "94--122",
journal = "Marxism 21",
issn = "1738-2998",
number = "No. 2, Summer",

}

Two Temporal Single System Interpretation of Marx Calculations of the MELT. / Potts, Nicholas.

In: Marxism 21, Vol. 13, No. No. 2, Summer, 06.2016, p. 94-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two Temporal Single System Interpretation of Marx Calculations of the MELT

AU - Potts, Nicholas

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Far too, often articles concerning the Temporal Single System Interpretation (TSSI) of Marx simply attempt to dismiss this interpretation of Marx, which frees his value theory from false allegations of inconsistency and redundancy, on the spurious grounds of its difference to ‘Marxist’ approaches that are influenced by the methods of ‘mainstream’ economics, such as simultaneous calculation of prices and values. As, sadly, critics of the TSSI outnumber its supporters, most journals insist that articles supporting the TSSI should follow/address the agenda of the TSSI’s critics. This ‘non-debate’ has held back attempts to explore the TSSI. In Potts (2011a) I noted for the first time that there is a difference between Kliman’s and Freeman’s methods of valuing commodities in the presence of stocks of commodities. I concluded that this difference of approach indicates how research informed by the TSSI of Marx is not a matter of following a particular dogma, but rather is an open and exciting route to attempting to apply Marx’s analysis of capitalism to understanding the world today. Potts (2011a) is not widely known as the electronic journal Critique of Political Economy, sadly, did not continue beyond its first issue. So in this article I shall repeat my analysis, focusing on how Freeman’s and Kliman’s different methods lead to different calculations of the monetary expression of labour-time (MELT).

AB - Far too, often articles concerning the Temporal Single System Interpretation (TSSI) of Marx simply attempt to dismiss this interpretation of Marx, which frees his value theory from false allegations of inconsistency and redundancy, on the spurious grounds of its difference to ‘Marxist’ approaches that are influenced by the methods of ‘mainstream’ economics, such as simultaneous calculation of prices and values. As, sadly, critics of the TSSI outnumber its supporters, most journals insist that articles supporting the TSSI should follow/address the agenda of the TSSI’s critics. This ‘non-debate’ has held back attempts to explore the TSSI. In Potts (2011a) I noted for the first time that there is a difference between Kliman’s and Freeman’s methods of valuing commodities in the presence of stocks of commodities. I concluded that this difference of approach indicates how research informed by the TSSI of Marx is not a matter of following a particular dogma, but rather is an open and exciting route to attempting to apply Marx’s analysis of capitalism to understanding the world today. Potts (2011a) is not widely known as the electronic journal Critique of Political Economy, sadly, did not continue beyond its first issue. So in this article I shall repeat my analysis, focusing on how Freeman’s and Kliman’s different methods lead to different calculations of the monetary expression of labour-time (MELT).

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 94

EP - 122

JO - Marxism 21

JF - Marxism 21

SN - 1738-2998

IS - No. 2, Summer

ER -