There are no non-responders to low or high resistance training volumes among older women

Matheus S. M. Barbalho, Paulo Gentil, Mikel Izquierdo, James Fisher, James Steele, Rodolfo A. Raiol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the prevalence of non-responders to different tests and to compare the effects of different resistance training (RT) volumes on muscle strength, anthropometric and functional performance of older women.

Methods

Three hundred seventy six women performed 12 weeks of RT with either low or high volume (LV, 71.29 ± 5.77 years and HV 69.73 ± 5.88 years, respectively). Both groups performed the same exercises, and all parameters were held constant except for the number of sets performed per week. LV performed 8–12 for upper and 4–6 for lower body, while HV performed 16–20 and 8–10, respectively. Before and after the training period, the participants were tested for bench press and leg press 1RM, 30-s chair stand, 30-s arm curl, six-minute walk test, sit and reach, body weight and waist circumference.

Results

Both groups significantly improved in all strength and functional tests and reduced their body weight and waist circumference. ANOVA revealed higher gains in the leg press 1RM, 30-s arm curls and 6-min walk test for the HV group and higher increases in the results of the sit and reach test for the LV group. However, the differences were negligible and may be attributable to a type I error due to the large sample size. Non-responsiveness was not apparent in any subject, as a positive response on at least one outcome was present in every participant.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that RT, even at low volume, improves waist circumference, muscle strength and physical function in the older population, with no evidence of non-responsiveness. Therefore, we should not be restrictive in prescribing this type of exercise to this population.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-26
JournalExperimental Gerontology
Volume99
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Waist Circumference
Muscle
Muscle Strength
Leg
Arm
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Body Weight
Exercise
Sample Size
Population
Analysis of Variance
Walk Test

Cite this

Barbalho, Matheus S. M. ; Gentil, Paulo ; Izquierdo, Mikel ; Fisher, James ; Steele, James ; Raiol, Rodolfo A. / There are no non-responders to low or high resistance training volumes among older women. In: Experimental Gerontology. 2017 ; Vol. 99. pp. 18-26.
@article{4209c57d7e4d4f1d828bd6d2c647bf9e,
title = "There are no non-responders to low or high resistance training volumes among older women",
abstract = "ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence of non-responders to different tests and to compare the effects of different resistance training (RT) volumes on muscle strength, anthropometric and functional performance of older women.MethodsThree hundred seventy six women performed 12 weeks of RT with either low or high volume (LV, 71.29 ± 5.77 years and HV 69.73 ± 5.88 years, respectively). Both groups performed the same exercises, and all parameters were held constant except for the number of sets performed per week. LV performed 8–12 for upper and 4–6 for lower body, while HV performed 16–20 and 8–10, respectively. Before and after the training period, the participants were tested for bench press and leg press 1RM, 30-s chair stand, 30-s arm curl, six-minute walk test, sit and reach, body weight and waist circumference.ResultsBoth groups significantly improved in all strength and functional tests and reduced their body weight and waist circumference. ANOVA revealed higher gains in the leg press 1RM, 30-s arm curls and 6-min walk test for the HV group and higher increases in the results of the sit and reach test for the LV group. However, the differences were negligible and may be attributable to a type I error due to the large sample size. Non-responsiveness was not apparent in any subject, as a positive response on at least one outcome was present in every participant.ConclusionsOur results suggest that RT, even at low volume, improves waist circumference, muscle strength and physical function in the older population, with no evidence of non-responsiveness. Therefore, we should not be restrictive in prescribing this type of exercise to this population.",
author = "Barbalho, {Matheus S. M.} and Paulo Gentil and Mikel Izquierdo and James Fisher and James Steele and Raiol, {Rodolfo A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "18--26",
journal = "Experimental Gerontology",
issn = "0531-5565",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

There are no non-responders to low or high resistance training volumes among older women. / Barbalho, Matheus S. M.; Gentil, Paulo; Izquierdo, Mikel; Fisher, James; Steele, James; Raiol, Rodolfo A.

In: Experimental Gerontology, Vol. 99, 14.09.2017, p. 18-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - There are no non-responders to low or high resistance training volumes among older women

AU - Barbalho, Matheus S. M.

AU - Gentil, Paulo

AU - Izquierdo, Mikel

AU - Fisher, James

AU - Steele, James

AU - Raiol, Rodolfo A.

PY - 2017/9/14

Y1 - 2017/9/14

N2 - ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence of non-responders to different tests and to compare the effects of different resistance training (RT) volumes on muscle strength, anthropometric and functional performance of older women.MethodsThree hundred seventy six women performed 12 weeks of RT with either low or high volume (LV, 71.29 ± 5.77 years and HV 69.73 ± 5.88 years, respectively). Both groups performed the same exercises, and all parameters were held constant except for the number of sets performed per week. LV performed 8–12 for upper and 4–6 for lower body, while HV performed 16–20 and 8–10, respectively. Before and after the training period, the participants were tested for bench press and leg press 1RM, 30-s chair stand, 30-s arm curl, six-minute walk test, sit and reach, body weight and waist circumference.ResultsBoth groups significantly improved in all strength and functional tests and reduced their body weight and waist circumference. ANOVA revealed higher gains in the leg press 1RM, 30-s arm curls and 6-min walk test for the HV group and higher increases in the results of the sit and reach test for the LV group. However, the differences were negligible and may be attributable to a type I error due to the large sample size. Non-responsiveness was not apparent in any subject, as a positive response on at least one outcome was present in every participant.ConclusionsOur results suggest that RT, even at low volume, improves waist circumference, muscle strength and physical function in the older population, with no evidence of non-responsiveness. Therefore, we should not be restrictive in prescribing this type of exercise to this population.

AB - ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence of non-responders to different tests and to compare the effects of different resistance training (RT) volumes on muscle strength, anthropometric and functional performance of older women.MethodsThree hundred seventy six women performed 12 weeks of RT with either low or high volume (LV, 71.29 ± 5.77 years and HV 69.73 ± 5.88 years, respectively). Both groups performed the same exercises, and all parameters were held constant except for the number of sets performed per week. LV performed 8–12 for upper and 4–6 for lower body, while HV performed 16–20 and 8–10, respectively. Before and after the training period, the participants were tested for bench press and leg press 1RM, 30-s chair stand, 30-s arm curl, six-minute walk test, sit and reach, body weight and waist circumference.ResultsBoth groups significantly improved in all strength and functional tests and reduced their body weight and waist circumference. ANOVA revealed higher gains in the leg press 1RM, 30-s arm curls and 6-min walk test for the HV group and higher increases in the results of the sit and reach test for the LV group. However, the differences were negligible and may be attributable to a type I error due to the large sample size. Non-responsiveness was not apparent in any subject, as a positive response on at least one outcome was present in every participant.ConclusionsOur results suggest that RT, even at low volume, improves waist circumference, muscle strength and physical function in the older population, with no evidence of non-responsiveness. Therefore, we should not be restrictive in prescribing this type of exercise to this population.

U2 - 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 99

SP - 18

EP - 26

JO - Experimental Gerontology

JF - Experimental Gerontology

SN - 0531-5565

ER -