The unseen child and safeguarding: 'Did not attend' guidelines in the NHS

Lisa Arai, Terence Stephenson, Helen Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Organisations in England's National Health Service (NHS) are required to have 'did not attend' (DNA) guidelines to help deal with the 'unseen child'.

AIMS: To map DNA and associated guidelines in paediatric services, examine differences in safeguarding response and advice in the guidelines and explore the experience of guideline users.

METHODS: A mapping approach was used to locate current DNA guidelines on English NHS organisations' websites. Analysis of the guidelines was supplemented with qualitative data from those who produce, monitor or use them.

RESULTS: Fewer than 8% of English NHS organisations had up-to-date guidelines in the public domain, though a further 41% stated that they had a DNA/similar policy in place or had an out-of-date guideline on their website. Advice to healthcare providers about the steps to take when a child DNAs fell into five categories: reflection and review; direct interaction with the family; indirect interaction with the family; liaison with internal colleagues; and external referral. Interviews with eight individuals led to the identification of four themes. The management of information flows was central to the effective management of DNA. Respondents also reported seeking support and advice from others. While all respondents spoke about the importance of supporting the family, the child's needs were central to dealing with non-attendance, and respondents demonstrated awareness of wider risk discourses.

CONCLUSIONS: We consider the implications of the work and suggest that evidence-informed guidelines developed nationally but tailored to specific services might be helpful for providers and users alike.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-20
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood
Volume100
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

National Health Programs
Guidelines
Organizations
Information Management
Public Sector
England
Health Personnel
Referral and Consultation
Interviews
Pediatrics
DNA

Cite this

Arai, Lisa ; Stephenson, Terence ; Roberts, Helen. / The unseen child and safeguarding: 'Did not attend' guidelines in the NHS. In: Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2015 ; Vol. 100, No. 6. pp. 517-20.
@article{3ddb11f55f1344f9ab7eebdc44f270f1,
title = "The unseen child and safeguarding: 'Did not attend' guidelines in the NHS",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Organisations in England's National Health Service (NHS) are required to have 'did not attend' (DNA) guidelines to help deal with the 'unseen child'.AIMS: To map DNA and associated guidelines in paediatric services, examine differences in safeguarding response and advice in the guidelines and explore the experience of guideline users.METHODS: A mapping approach was used to locate current DNA guidelines on English NHS organisations' websites. Analysis of the guidelines was supplemented with qualitative data from those who produce, monitor or use them.RESULTS: Fewer than 8{\%} of English NHS organisations had up-to-date guidelines in the public domain, though a further 41{\%} stated that they had a DNA/similar policy in place or had an out-of-date guideline on their website. Advice to healthcare providers about the steps to take when a child DNAs fell into five categories: reflection and review; direct interaction with the family; indirect interaction with the family; liaison with internal colleagues; and external referral. Interviews with eight individuals led to the identification of four themes. The management of information flows was central to the effective management of DNA. Respondents also reported seeking support and advice from others. While all respondents spoke about the importance of supporting the family, the child's needs were central to dealing with non-attendance, and respondents demonstrated awareness of wider risk discourses.CONCLUSIONS: We consider the implications of the work and suggest that evidence-informed guidelines developed nationally but tailored to specific services might be helpful for providers and users alike.",
author = "Lisa Arai and Terence Stephenson and Helen Roberts",
note = "Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1136/archdischild-2014-307294",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "517--20",
journal = "Archives of Disease in Childhood",
issn = "0003-9888",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

The unseen child and safeguarding: 'Did not attend' guidelines in the NHS. / Arai, Lisa; Stephenson, Terence; Roberts, Helen.

In: Archives of Disease in Childhood, Vol. 100, No. 6, 06.2015, p. 517-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The unseen child and safeguarding: 'Did not attend' guidelines in the NHS

AU - Arai, Lisa

AU - Stephenson, Terence

AU - Roberts, Helen

N1 - Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: Organisations in England's National Health Service (NHS) are required to have 'did not attend' (DNA) guidelines to help deal with the 'unseen child'.AIMS: To map DNA and associated guidelines in paediatric services, examine differences in safeguarding response and advice in the guidelines and explore the experience of guideline users.METHODS: A mapping approach was used to locate current DNA guidelines on English NHS organisations' websites. Analysis of the guidelines was supplemented with qualitative data from those who produce, monitor or use them.RESULTS: Fewer than 8% of English NHS organisations had up-to-date guidelines in the public domain, though a further 41% stated that they had a DNA/similar policy in place or had an out-of-date guideline on their website. Advice to healthcare providers about the steps to take when a child DNAs fell into five categories: reflection and review; direct interaction with the family; indirect interaction with the family; liaison with internal colleagues; and external referral. Interviews with eight individuals led to the identification of four themes. The management of information flows was central to the effective management of DNA. Respondents also reported seeking support and advice from others. While all respondents spoke about the importance of supporting the family, the child's needs were central to dealing with non-attendance, and respondents demonstrated awareness of wider risk discourses.CONCLUSIONS: We consider the implications of the work and suggest that evidence-informed guidelines developed nationally but tailored to specific services might be helpful for providers and users alike.

AB - BACKGROUND: Organisations in England's National Health Service (NHS) are required to have 'did not attend' (DNA) guidelines to help deal with the 'unseen child'.AIMS: To map DNA and associated guidelines in paediatric services, examine differences in safeguarding response and advice in the guidelines and explore the experience of guideline users.METHODS: A mapping approach was used to locate current DNA guidelines on English NHS organisations' websites. Analysis of the guidelines was supplemented with qualitative data from those who produce, monitor or use them.RESULTS: Fewer than 8% of English NHS organisations had up-to-date guidelines in the public domain, though a further 41% stated that they had a DNA/similar policy in place or had an out-of-date guideline on their website. Advice to healthcare providers about the steps to take when a child DNAs fell into five categories: reflection and review; direct interaction with the family; indirect interaction with the family; liaison with internal colleagues; and external referral. Interviews with eight individuals led to the identification of four themes. The management of information flows was central to the effective management of DNA. Respondents also reported seeking support and advice from others. While all respondents spoke about the importance of supporting the family, the child's needs were central to dealing with non-attendance, and respondents demonstrated awareness of wider risk discourses.CONCLUSIONS: We consider the implications of the work and suggest that evidence-informed guidelines developed nationally but tailored to specific services might be helpful for providers and users alike.

U2 - 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307294

DO - 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307294

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 517

EP - 520

JO - Archives of Disease in Childhood

JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood

SN - 0003-9888

IS - 6

ER -