The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition

S.V. Stevenage, G.J. Neil, J. Barlow, A. Dyson, C. Eaton-Brown, B. Parsons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The results of two experiments are presented which explore the effect of distractor items on face and voice recognition. Following from the suggestion that voice processing is relatively weak compared to face processing, it was anticipated that voice recognition would be more affected by the presentation of distractor items between study and test compared to face recognition. Using a sequential matching task with a fixed interval between study and test that either incorporated distractor items or did not, the results supported our prediction. Face recognition remained strong irrespective of the number of distractor items between study and test. In contrast, voice recognition was significantly impaired by the presence of distractor items regardless of their number (Experiment 1). This pattern remained whether distractor items were highly similar to the targets or not (Experiment 2). These results offer support for the proposal that voice processing is a relatively vulnerable method of identification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-175
Number of pages9
JournalPsychological Research
Volume77
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Distractor
Distraction
Facial Recognition
Experiment
Face Recognition
Prediction
Face Processing

Cite this

Stevenage, S. V., Neil, G. J., Barlow, J., Dyson, A., Eaton-Brown, C., & Parsons, B. (2013). The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition. Psychological Research, 77(2), 167-175.
Stevenage, S.V. ; Neil, G.J. ; Barlow, J. ; Dyson, A. ; Eaton-Brown, C. ; Parsons, B. / The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition. In: Psychological Research. 2013 ; Vol. 77, No. 2. pp. 167-175.
@article{4fdf3779acc342a098aa88c4eb87a8fb,
title = "The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition",
abstract = "The results of two experiments are presented which explore the effect of distractor items on face and voice recognition. Following from the suggestion that voice processing is relatively weak compared to face processing, it was anticipated that voice recognition would be more affected by the presentation of distractor items between study and test compared to face recognition. Using a sequential matching task with a fixed interval between study and test that either incorporated distractor items or did not, the results supported our prediction. Face recognition remained strong irrespective of the number of distractor items between study and test. In contrast, voice recognition was significantly impaired by the presence of distractor items regardless of their number (Experiment 1). This pattern remained whether distractor items were highly similar to the targets or not (Experiment 2). These results offer support for the proposal that voice processing is a relatively vulnerable method of identification.",
author = "S.V. Stevenage and G.J. Neil and J. Barlow and A. Dyson and C. Eaton-Brown and B. Parsons",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "167--175",
journal = "Psychological Research",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

Stevenage, SV, Neil, GJ, Barlow, J, Dyson, A, Eaton-Brown, C & Parsons, B 2013, 'The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition' Psychological Research, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 167-175.

The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition. / Stevenage, S.V.; Neil, G.J.; Barlow, J.; Dyson, A.; Eaton-Brown, C.; Parsons, B.

In: Psychological Research, Vol. 77, No. 2, 2013, p. 167-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition

AU - Stevenage, S.V.

AU - Neil, G.J.

AU - Barlow, J.

AU - Dyson, A.

AU - Eaton-Brown, C.

AU - Parsons, B.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The results of two experiments are presented which explore the effect of distractor items on face and voice recognition. Following from the suggestion that voice processing is relatively weak compared to face processing, it was anticipated that voice recognition would be more affected by the presentation of distractor items between study and test compared to face recognition. Using a sequential matching task with a fixed interval between study and test that either incorporated distractor items or did not, the results supported our prediction. Face recognition remained strong irrespective of the number of distractor items between study and test. In contrast, voice recognition was significantly impaired by the presence of distractor items regardless of their number (Experiment 1). This pattern remained whether distractor items were highly similar to the targets or not (Experiment 2). These results offer support for the proposal that voice processing is a relatively vulnerable method of identification.

AB - The results of two experiments are presented which explore the effect of distractor items on face and voice recognition. Following from the suggestion that voice processing is relatively weak compared to face processing, it was anticipated that voice recognition would be more affected by the presentation of distractor items between study and test compared to face recognition. Using a sequential matching task with a fixed interval between study and test that either incorporated distractor items or did not, the results supported our prediction. Face recognition remained strong irrespective of the number of distractor items between study and test. In contrast, voice recognition was significantly impaired by the presence of distractor items regardless of their number (Experiment 1). This pattern remained whether distractor items were highly similar to the targets or not (Experiment 2). These results offer support for the proposal that voice processing is a relatively vulnerable method of identification.

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 167

EP - 175

JO - Psychological Research

JF - Psychological Research

SN - 0340-0727

IS - 2

ER -

Stevenage SV, Neil GJ, Barlow J, Dyson A, Eaton-Brown C, Parsons B. The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition. Psychological Research. 2013;77(2):167-175.