Testing the reliability of hands and ears as biometrics: the importance of viewpoint

S.V. Stevenage, C. Walpole, G.J. Neil, S.M. Black

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two experiments are presented to explore the limits when matching a sample to a suspect utilising the hand as a novel biometric. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that novice participants were able to match hands at above-chance levels as viewpoint changed. Notably, a moderate change in viewpoint had no notable effect, but a more substantial change in viewpoint affected performance significantly. Importantly, the impact of viewpoint when matching hands was smaller than that when matching ears in a control condition. This was consistent with the suggestion that the flexibility of the hand may have minimised the negative impact of a sub-optimal view. The results of Experiment 2 confirmed that training via a 10 minute expert video was sufficient to reduce the impact of viewpoint in the most difficult case but not to remove it entirely. The implications of these results were discussed in terms of the theoretical importance of function when considering the canonical view, and in terms of the applied value of the hand as a reliable biometric across viewing conditions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)989-999
Number of pages11
JournalPsychological Research
Volume79
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Ear
Hand
Experiment
Biometrics
Testing
Novice

Cite this

Stevenage, S.V. ; Walpole, C. ; Neil, G.J. ; Black, S.M. / Testing the reliability of hands and ears as biometrics: the importance of viewpoint. In: Psychological Research. 2014 ; Vol. 79, No. 6. pp. 989-999.
@article{a586ae30d35541d6a377f305908e84ba,
title = "Testing the reliability of hands and ears as biometrics: the importance of viewpoint",
abstract = "Two experiments are presented to explore the limits when matching a sample to a suspect utilising the hand as a novel biometric. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that novice participants were able to match hands at above-chance levels as viewpoint changed. Notably, a moderate change in viewpoint had no notable effect, but a more substantial change in viewpoint affected performance significantly. Importantly, the impact of viewpoint when matching hands was smaller than that when matching ears in a control condition. This was consistent with the suggestion that the flexibility of the hand may have minimised the negative impact of a sub-optimal view. The results of Experiment 2 confirmed that training via a 10 minute expert video was sufficient to reduce the impact of viewpoint in the most difficult case but not to remove it entirely. The implications of these results were discussed in terms of the theoretical importance of function when considering the canonical view, and in terms of the applied value of the hand as a reliable biometric across viewing conditions.",
author = "S.V. Stevenage and C. Walpole and G.J. Neil and S.M. Black",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "989--999",
journal = "Psychological Research",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

Testing the reliability of hands and ears as biometrics: the importance of viewpoint. / Stevenage, S.V.; Walpole, C.; Neil, G.J.; Black, S.M.

In: Psychological Research, Vol. 79, No. 6, 2014, p. 989-999.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing the reliability of hands and ears as biometrics: the importance of viewpoint

AU - Stevenage, S.V.

AU - Walpole, C.

AU - Neil, G.J.

AU - Black, S.M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Two experiments are presented to explore the limits when matching a sample to a suspect utilising the hand as a novel biometric. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that novice participants were able to match hands at above-chance levels as viewpoint changed. Notably, a moderate change in viewpoint had no notable effect, but a more substantial change in viewpoint affected performance significantly. Importantly, the impact of viewpoint when matching hands was smaller than that when matching ears in a control condition. This was consistent with the suggestion that the flexibility of the hand may have minimised the negative impact of a sub-optimal view. The results of Experiment 2 confirmed that training via a 10 minute expert video was sufficient to reduce the impact of viewpoint in the most difficult case but not to remove it entirely. The implications of these results were discussed in terms of the theoretical importance of function when considering the canonical view, and in terms of the applied value of the hand as a reliable biometric across viewing conditions.

AB - Two experiments are presented to explore the limits when matching a sample to a suspect utilising the hand as a novel biometric. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that novice participants were able to match hands at above-chance levels as viewpoint changed. Notably, a moderate change in viewpoint had no notable effect, but a more substantial change in viewpoint affected performance significantly. Importantly, the impact of viewpoint when matching hands was smaller than that when matching ears in a control condition. This was consistent with the suggestion that the flexibility of the hand may have minimised the negative impact of a sub-optimal view. The results of Experiment 2 confirmed that training via a 10 minute expert video was sufficient to reduce the impact of viewpoint in the most difficult case but not to remove it entirely. The implications of these results were discussed in terms of the theoretical importance of function when considering the canonical view, and in terms of the applied value of the hand as a reliable biometric across viewing conditions.

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 989

EP - 999

JO - Psychological Research

JF - Psychological Research

SN - 0340-0727

IS - 6

ER -