TY - JOUR
T1 - Tackling in physical education rugby
T2 - an unnecessary risk?
AU - White, Adam
AU - Batten , John
AU - Anderson , Eric
AU - Burns, andy
AU - Batey, Jo
AU - Ryan-Stewart , Helen
AU - Discombe, Russell
PY - 2018/1/23
Y1 - 2018/1/23
N2 - Since 2016, we have been strong advocates for the removal of tackling from rugby (League and Union) played in school physical education in the UK. This is because (A) tackling is the leading cause of injury in rugby, (B) rugby has a level of risk that is higher than non-contact sports, (C) there is no requirement or need for tackling as part of the school physical education curriculum, and (D) many children are compelled to participate in contact rugby. In response to this call, the Chief Medical Officers and the Physical Activity Expert Group commented: ‘The Committee reject the call to ban tackling, as they do not feel rugby participation poses an unacceptable risk of harm.’ Yet, the notion of risk (un)acceptability is a construct that needs further discussion, which we will start here.
AB - Since 2016, we have been strong advocates for the removal of tackling from rugby (League and Union) played in school physical education in the UK. This is because (A) tackling is the leading cause of injury in rugby, (B) rugby has a level of risk that is higher than non-contact sports, (C) there is no requirement or need for tackling as part of the school physical education curriculum, and (D) many children are compelled to participate in contact rugby. In response to this call, the Chief Medical Officers and the Physical Activity Expert Group commented: ‘The Committee reject the call to ban tackling, as they do not feel rugby participation poses an unacceptable risk of harm.’ Yet, the notion of risk (un)acceptability is a construct that needs further discussion, which we will start here.
U2 - 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042672
DO - 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042672
M3 - Article
SN - 1353-8047
VL - 24
SP - 114
EP - 115
JO - Injury Prevention
JF - Injury Prevention
IS - 2
ER -