Tackling in physical education rugby: an unnecessary risk?

Adam White, John Batten , Eric Anderson , andy Burns, Jo Batey, Helen Ryan-Stewart , Russell Discombe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Since 2016, we have been strong advocates for the removal of tackling from rugby (League and Union) played in school physical education in the UK. This is because (A) tackling is the leading cause of injury in rugby, (B) rugby has a level of risk that is higher than non-contact sports, (C) there is no requirement or need for tackling as part of the school physical education curriculum, and (D) many children are compelled to participate in contact rugby. In response to this call, the Chief Medical Officers and the Physical Activity Expert Group commented: ‘The Committee reject the call to ban tackling, as they do not feel rugby participation poses an unacceptable risk of harm.’ Yet, the notion of risk (un)acceptability is a construct that needs further discussion, which we will start here.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-115
JournalInjury Prevention
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tackling in physical education rugby: an unnecessary risk?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this