Re-evaluating the ‘death of progressive rock’: Critical reception and journalistic narratives in the British weekly music press of the early- to mid-1970s

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Academic and journalistic accounts of ‘progressive rock’ construct it as a genre that emerged in the late 1960s, flourished commercially and artistically from 1972 to 1974 and sank into decline by the late 1970s due primarily to the emergence of punk rock in 1976. Musicological, aesthetic and social descriptions of this genre of rock music are offered by a number of authors including Macan (1997), Stump (1997) and Martin (1998), yet this upsurge in academic and popular interest in the mid-late 1990s struggles with defining what, precisely, ‘progressive rock’ is. These studies rarely examine how the bands that they classify as ‘progressive rock’ were discussed in the press of the early 1970s yet, as Anderton & Atton (forthcoming) demonstrate, the assumptions which are made about genre definitions and history need to questioned much more. In this chapter, the British weekly music press of the early 1970s is examined (particularly Melody Maker which championed both progressive rock and punk rock) to show the somewhat ambivalent reception that the bands gained and to question the common myth that ‘punk killed prog’. It suggests that use of the term ‘progressive rock’ must be questioned in the early 1970s context, and that signs of press condemnation and dissatisfaction pre-date punk’s ‘year zero’ by three or four years. The chapter is complementary to that which follows and together these two chapters suggest an alternative way of looking at the history of, and relationship between, progressive rock and punk rock in the 1970s.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMedia Narratives in Popular Music
EditorsChris Anderton, Martin James
PublisherBloomsbury Academic
Chapter11
Publication statusIn preparation - 2019

Fingerprint

1970s
Rock
Critical Reception
British music
Punk Rock
Punk
History
Rock music
Condemnation
1960s
1990s
Reception
Aesthetics
Melody

Cite this

Anderton, C. (2019). Re-evaluating the ‘death of progressive rock’: Critical reception and journalistic narratives in the British weekly music press of the early- to mid-1970s . Manuscript in preparation. In C. Anderton, & M. James (Eds.), Media Narratives in Popular Music Bloomsbury Academic.
@inbook{a6e1f9f1cf274dc382d4f9bc917247c2,
title = "Re-evaluating the ‘death of progressive rock’: Critical reception and journalistic narratives in the British weekly music press of the early- to mid-1970s",
abstract = "Academic and journalistic accounts of ‘progressive rock’ construct it as a genre that emerged in the late 1960s, flourished commercially and artistically from 1972 to 1974 and sank into decline by the late 1970s due primarily to the emergence of punk rock in 1976. Musicological, aesthetic and social descriptions of this genre of rock music are offered by a number of authors including Macan (1997), Stump (1997) and Martin (1998), yet this upsurge in academic and popular interest in the mid-late 1990s struggles with defining what, precisely, ‘progressive rock’ is. These studies rarely examine how the bands that they classify as ‘progressive rock’ were discussed in the press of the early 1970s yet, as Anderton & Atton (forthcoming) demonstrate, the assumptions which are made about genre definitions and history need to questioned much more. In this chapter, the British weekly music press of the early 1970s is examined (particularly Melody Maker which championed both progressive rock and punk rock) to show the somewhat ambivalent reception that the bands gained and to question the common myth that ‘punk killed prog’. It suggests that use of the term ‘progressive rock’ must be questioned in the early 1970s context, and that signs of press condemnation and dissatisfaction pre-date punk’s ‘year zero’ by three or four years. The chapter is complementary to that which follows and together these two chapters suggest an alternative way of looking at the history of, and relationship between, progressive rock and punk rock in the 1970s.",
author = "Chris Anderton",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
editor = "Chris Anderton and Martin James",
booktitle = "Media Narratives in Popular Music",
publisher = "Bloomsbury Academic",

}

Re-evaluating the ‘death of progressive rock’ : Critical reception and journalistic narratives in the British weekly music press of the early- to mid-1970s . / Anderton, Chris.

Media Narratives in Popular Music. ed. / Chris Anderton; Martin James. Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Re-evaluating the ‘death of progressive rock’

T2 - Critical reception and journalistic narratives in the British weekly music press of the early- to mid-1970s

AU - Anderton, Chris

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Academic and journalistic accounts of ‘progressive rock’ construct it as a genre that emerged in the late 1960s, flourished commercially and artistically from 1972 to 1974 and sank into decline by the late 1970s due primarily to the emergence of punk rock in 1976. Musicological, aesthetic and social descriptions of this genre of rock music are offered by a number of authors including Macan (1997), Stump (1997) and Martin (1998), yet this upsurge in academic and popular interest in the mid-late 1990s struggles with defining what, precisely, ‘progressive rock’ is. These studies rarely examine how the bands that they classify as ‘progressive rock’ were discussed in the press of the early 1970s yet, as Anderton & Atton (forthcoming) demonstrate, the assumptions which are made about genre definitions and history need to questioned much more. In this chapter, the British weekly music press of the early 1970s is examined (particularly Melody Maker which championed both progressive rock and punk rock) to show the somewhat ambivalent reception that the bands gained and to question the common myth that ‘punk killed prog’. It suggests that use of the term ‘progressive rock’ must be questioned in the early 1970s context, and that signs of press condemnation and dissatisfaction pre-date punk’s ‘year zero’ by three or four years. The chapter is complementary to that which follows and together these two chapters suggest an alternative way of looking at the history of, and relationship between, progressive rock and punk rock in the 1970s.

AB - Academic and journalistic accounts of ‘progressive rock’ construct it as a genre that emerged in the late 1960s, flourished commercially and artistically from 1972 to 1974 and sank into decline by the late 1970s due primarily to the emergence of punk rock in 1976. Musicological, aesthetic and social descriptions of this genre of rock music are offered by a number of authors including Macan (1997), Stump (1997) and Martin (1998), yet this upsurge in academic and popular interest in the mid-late 1990s struggles with defining what, precisely, ‘progressive rock’ is. These studies rarely examine how the bands that they classify as ‘progressive rock’ were discussed in the press of the early 1970s yet, as Anderton & Atton (forthcoming) demonstrate, the assumptions which are made about genre definitions and history need to questioned much more. In this chapter, the British weekly music press of the early 1970s is examined (particularly Melody Maker which championed both progressive rock and punk rock) to show the somewhat ambivalent reception that the bands gained and to question the common myth that ‘punk killed prog’. It suggests that use of the term ‘progressive rock’ must be questioned in the early 1970s context, and that signs of press condemnation and dissatisfaction pre-date punk’s ‘year zero’ by three or four years. The chapter is complementary to that which follows and together these two chapters suggest an alternative way of looking at the history of, and relationship between, progressive rock and punk rock in the 1970s.

M3 - Chapter

BT - Media Narratives in Popular Music

A2 - Anderton, Chris

A2 - James, Martin

PB - Bloomsbury Academic

ER -