Questioning the resistance/aerobic dichotomy: A commentary on physiological adaptations determined by effort rather than exercise modality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper discusses and challenges the current opinion that exercise adaptation is generally defined by modality; resistance exercise (RE), or aerobic exercise (AE). In presenting a strong body of recent research which demonstrably challenges these perceptions we suggest alternate hypotheses towards physiological adaptation which is hinged more upon the effort than the exercise modality. Practical implications of this interpretation of exercise adaptation might effect change in exercise adherence since existing barriers to exercise of time, costs, specialized equipment, etc. become nullified. In presenting the evidence herein we suggest that lay persons wishing to attain the health and fitness (including strength and muscle hypertrophy) benefits of exercise can choose from a wide range of potential exercise modalities so long as the effort is high. Future research should consider this hypothesis by directly comparing RE and AE for acute responses and chronic adaptations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-137
JournalJournal of Human Kinetics
Volume44
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Physiological Adaptation
Exercise
Muscle Strength
Hypertrophy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Health
Research

Cite this

@article{0b318ed61e2c4baeb76d6769a5a98e4e,
title = "Questioning the resistance/aerobic dichotomy: A commentary on physiological adaptations determined by effort rather than exercise modality",
abstract = "This paper discusses and challenges the current opinion that exercise adaptation is generally defined by modality; resistance exercise (RE), or aerobic exercise (AE). In presenting a strong body of recent research which demonstrably challenges these perceptions we suggest alternate hypotheses towards physiological adaptation which is hinged more upon the effort than the exercise modality. Practical implications of this interpretation of exercise adaptation might effect change in exercise adherence since existing barriers to exercise of time, costs, specialized equipment, etc. become nullified. In presenting the evidence herein we suggest that lay persons wishing to attain the health and fitness (including strength and muscle hypertrophy) benefits of exercise can choose from a wide range of potential exercise modalities so long as the effort is high. Future research should consider this hypothesis by directly comparing RE and AE for acute responses and chronic adaptations.",
author = "James Fisher and James Steele",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.2478/hukin-2014-0119",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "129--137",
journal = "Journal of Human Kinetics",
issn = "1640-5544",
publisher = "Polish Academy of Science, Committee of Physical Culture",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Questioning the resistance/aerobic dichotomy: A commentary on physiological adaptations determined by effort rather than exercise modality

AU - Fisher, James

AU - Steele, James

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper discusses and challenges the current opinion that exercise adaptation is generally defined by modality; resistance exercise (RE), or aerobic exercise (AE). In presenting a strong body of recent research which demonstrably challenges these perceptions we suggest alternate hypotheses towards physiological adaptation which is hinged more upon the effort than the exercise modality. Practical implications of this interpretation of exercise adaptation might effect change in exercise adherence since existing barriers to exercise of time, costs, specialized equipment, etc. become nullified. In presenting the evidence herein we suggest that lay persons wishing to attain the health and fitness (including strength and muscle hypertrophy) benefits of exercise can choose from a wide range of potential exercise modalities so long as the effort is high. Future research should consider this hypothesis by directly comparing RE and AE for acute responses and chronic adaptations.

AB - This paper discusses and challenges the current opinion that exercise adaptation is generally defined by modality; resistance exercise (RE), or aerobic exercise (AE). In presenting a strong body of recent research which demonstrably challenges these perceptions we suggest alternate hypotheses towards physiological adaptation which is hinged more upon the effort than the exercise modality. Practical implications of this interpretation of exercise adaptation might effect change in exercise adherence since existing barriers to exercise of time, costs, specialized equipment, etc. become nullified. In presenting the evidence herein we suggest that lay persons wishing to attain the health and fitness (including strength and muscle hypertrophy) benefits of exercise can choose from a wide range of potential exercise modalities so long as the effort is high. Future research should consider this hypothesis by directly comparing RE and AE for acute responses and chronic adaptations.

U2 - 10.2478/hukin-2014-0119

DO - 10.2478/hukin-2014-0119

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 129

EP - 137

JO - Journal of Human Kinetics

JF - Journal of Human Kinetics

SN - 1640-5544

ER -