Photography and the Gaze: The Ethics of Vision Inverted

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It can not be denied that our age is the epoch of the photograph: we are surrounded by photographic images in our living rooms, in the streets, in our places of work and in our places of leisure. And yet, the photographic image was generally ignored by most major twentieth century philosophers working in phenomenology. Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Lacan and Levinas all choose examples of paintings rather than photographs to illustrate, and/or ground, their arguments on issues of visual perception, aesthetic, ethics and politics. It is surprising and disturbing that despite the fact that these philosophers were all exposed to an ever increasing number of disturbing and difficult photographic images, often raising philosophical issues relevant to their own work, they chose to ignore discussions of such photographs in their philosophical work.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-93
Number of pages15
JournalParallax
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2008

Fingerprint

photography
moral philosophy
visual perception
phenomenology
aesthetics
twentieth century
politics
Photography
Photographic Images
Philosopher

Cite this

@article{c03f733b7e7e46b7b65bf43b12bc9bfd,
title = "Photography and the Gaze: The Ethics of Vision Inverted",
abstract = "It can not be denied that our age is the epoch of the photograph: we are surrounded by photographic images in our living rooms, in the streets, in our places of work and in our places of leisure. And yet, the photographic image was generally ignored by most major twentieth century philosophers working in phenomenology. Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Lacan and Levinas all choose examples of paintings rather than photographs to illustrate, and/or ground, their arguments on issues of visual perception, aesthetic, ethics and politics. It is surprising and disturbing that despite the fact that these philosophers were all exposed to an ever increasing number of disturbing and difficult photographic images, often raising philosophical issues relevant to their own work, they chose to ignore discussions of such photographs in their philosophical work.",
author = "Nicola Foster",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/13534640801990590",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "78--93",
journal = "Parallax",
issn = "1353-4645",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Photography and the Gaze : The Ethics of Vision Inverted. / Foster, Nicola.

In: Parallax, Vol. 14, No. 2, 30.04.2008, p. 78-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Photography and the Gaze

T2 - The Ethics of Vision Inverted

AU - Foster, Nicola

PY - 2008/4/30

Y1 - 2008/4/30

N2 - It can not be denied that our age is the epoch of the photograph: we are surrounded by photographic images in our living rooms, in the streets, in our places of work and in our places of leisure. And yet, the photographic image was generally ignored by most major twentieth century philosophers working in phenomenology. Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Lacan and Levinas all choose examples of paintings rather than photographs to illustrate, and/or ground, their arguments on issues of visual perception, aesthetic, ethics and politics. It is surprising and disturbing that despite the fact that these philosophers were all exposed to an ever increasing number of disturbing and difficult photographic images, often raising philosophical issues relevant to their own work, they chose to ignore discussions of such photographs in their philosophical work.

AB - It can not be denied that our age is the epoch of the photograph: we are surrounded by photographic images in our living rooms, in the streets, in our places of work and in our places of leisure. And yet, the photographic image was generally ignored by most major twentieth century philosophers working in phenomenology. Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Lacan and Levinas all choose examples of paintings rather than photographs to illustrate, and/or ground, their arguments on issues of visual perception, aesthetic, ethics and politics. It is surprising and disturbing that despite the fact that these philosophers were all exposed to an ever increasing number of disturbing and difficult photographic images, often raising philosophical issues relevant to their own work, they chose to ignore discussions of such photographs in their philosophical work.

U2 - 10.1080/13534640801990590

DO - 10.1080/13534640801990590

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 78

EP - 93

JO - Parallax

JF - Parallax

SN - 1353-4645

IS - 2

ER -