Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints: a case study of Southampton, UK

Laurence Wright, Ian Williams, Simon Kemp, Patrick Osborne

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Sub-national governments are increasingly interested in local-level climate change management. Carbon- (CO2 and CH4) and climate-footprints—(Kyoto Basket GHGs) (effectively single impact category LCA metrics, for global warming potential) provide an opportunity to develop models to facilitate effective mitigation. Three approaches are available for the footprinting of sub-national communities. Territorial-based approaches, which focus on production emissions within the geo-political boundaries, are useful for highlighting local emission sources but do not reflect the transboundary nature of sub-national community infrastructures. Transboundary approaches, which extend territorial footprints through the inclusion of key cross boundary flows of materials and energy, are more representative of community structures and processes but there are concerns regarding comparability between studies. The third option, consumption-based, considers global GHG emissions that result from final consumption (households, governments, and investment). Using a case study of Southampton, UK, this chapter develops the data and methods required for a sub-national territorial, transboundary, and consumption-based carbon and climate footprints. The results and implication of each footprinting perspective are discussed in the context of emerging international standards. The study clearly shows that the carbon footprint (CO2 and CH4 only) offers a low-cost, low-data, universal metric of anthropogenic GHG emission and subsequent management.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNew Frontiers on Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Application
EditorsAntonella Petrillo, Fabio De Felice
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherInTechOpen
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

footprint
carbon
climate
political boundary
carbon footprint
global warming
community structure
mitigation
infrastructure
climate change
cost
energy
consumption
household
emission source
material
method

Cite this

Wright, L., Williams, I., Kemp, S., & Osborne, P. (2019). Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints: a case study of Southampton, UK. In A. Petrillo, & F. De Felice (Eds.), New Frontiers on Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Application London: InTechOpen. https://doi.org/Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints
Wright, Laurence ; Williams, Ian ; Kemp, Simon ; Osborne, Patrick. / Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints : a case study of Southampton, UK. New Frontiers on Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Application. editor / Antonella Petrillo ; Fabio De Felice. London : InTechOpen, 2019.
@inbook{fca7042099b4404cbf42319bf1eaa904,
title = "Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints: a case study of Southampton, UK",
abstract = "Sub-national governments are increasingly interested in local-level climate change management. Carbon- (CO2 and CH4) and climate-footprints—(Kyoto Basket GHGs) (effectively single impact category LCA metrics, for global warming potential) provide an opportunity to develop models to facilitate effective mitigation. Three approaches are available for the footprinting of sub-national communities. Territorial-based approaches, which focus on production emissions within the geo-political boundaries, are useful for highlighting local emission sources but do not reflect the transboundary nature of sub-national community infrastructures. Transboundary approaches, which extend territorial footprints through the inclusion of key cross boundary flows of materials and energy, are more representative of community structures and processes but there are concerns regarding comparability between studies. The third option, consumption-based, considers global GHG emissions that result from final consumption (households, governments, and investment). Using a case study of Southampton, UK, this chapter develops the data and methods required for a sub-national territorial, transboundary, and consumption-based carbon and climate footprints. The results and implication of each footprinting perspective are discussed in the context of emerging international standards. The study clearly shows that the carbon footprint (CO2 and CH4 only) offers a low-cost, low-data, universal metric of anthropogenic GHG emission and subsequent management.",
author = "Laurence Wright and Ian Williams and Simon Kemp and Patrick Osborne",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints",
language = "English",
editor = "Antonella Petrillo and {De Felice}, Fabio",
booktitle = "New Frontiers on Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Application",
publisher = "InTechOpen",

}

Wright, L, Williams, I, Kemp, S & Osborne, P 2019, Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints: a case study of Southampton, UK. in A Petrillo & F De Felice (eds), New Frontiers on Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Application. InTechOpen, London. https://doi.org/Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints

Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints : a case study of Southampton, UK. / Wright, Laurence; Williams, Ian; Kemp, Simon; Osborne, Patrick.

New Frontiers on Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Application. ed. / Antonella Petrillo; Fabio De Felice. London : InTechOpen, 2019.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints

T2 - a case study of Southampton, UK

AU - Wright, Laurence

AU - Williams, Ian

AU - Kemp, Simon

AU - Osborne, Patrick

PY - 2019/1/31

Y1 - 2019/1/31

N2 - Sub-national governments are increasingly interested in local-level climate change management. Carbon- (CO2 and CH4) and climate-footprints—(Kyoto Basket GHGs) (effectively single impact category LCA metrics, for global warming potential) provide an opportunity to develop models to facilitate effective mitigation. Three approaches are available for the footprinting of sub-national communities. Territorial-based approaches, which focus on production emissions within the geo-political boundaries, are useful for highlighting local emission sources but do not reflect the transboundary nature of sub-national community infrastructures. Transboundary approaches, which extend territorial footprints through the inclusion of key cross boundary flows of materials and energy, are more representative of community structures and processes but there are concerns regarding comparability between studies. The third option, consumption-based, considers global GHG emissions that result from final consumption (households, governments, and investment). Using a case study of Southampton, UK, this chapter develops the data and methods required for a sub-national territorial, transboundary, and consumption-based carbon and climate footprints. The results and implication of each footprinting perspective are discussed in the context of emerging international standards. The study clearly shows that the carbon footprint (CO2 and CH4 only) offers a low-cost, low-data, universal metric of anthropogenic GHG emission and subsequent management.

AB - Sub-national governments are increasingly interested in local-level climate change management. Carbon- (CO2 and CH4) and climate-footprints—(Kyoto Basket GHGs) (effectively single impact category LCA metrics, for global warming potential) provide an opportunity to develop models to facilitate effective mitigation. Three approaches are available for the footprinting of sub-national communities. Territorial-based approaches, which focus on production emissions within the geo-political boundaries, are useful for highlighting local emission sources but do not reflect the transboundary nature of sub-national community infrastructures. Transboundary approaches, which extend territorial footprints through the inclusion of key cross boundary flows of materials and energy, are more representative of community structures and processes but there are concerns regarding comparability between studies. The third option, consumption-based, considers global GHG emissions that result from final consumption (households, governments, and investment). Using a case study of Southampton, UK, this chapter develops the data and methods required for a sub-national territorial, transboundary, and consumption-based carbon and climate footprints. The results and implication of each footprinting perspective are discussed in the context of emerging international standards. The study clearly shows that the carbon footprint (CO2 and CH4 only) offers a low-cost, low-data, universal metric of anthropogenic GHG emission and subsequent management.

U2 - Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints

DO - Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints

M3 - Chapter

BT - New Frontiers on Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Application

A2 - Petrillo, Antonella

A2 - De Felice, Fabio

PB - InTechOpen

CY - London

ER -

Wright L, Williams I, Kemp S, Osborne P. Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints: a case study of Southampton, UK. In Petrillo A, De Felice F, editors, New Frontiers on Life Cycle Assessment - Theory and Application. London: InTechOpen. 2019 https://doi.org/Perspectives on Subnational Carbon & Climate Footprints