Involving service users in the development of the Support at Home: Interventions to Enhance Life in Dementia Carer Supporter Programme for family carers of people with dementia.

Karen Burnell, Amber Selwood, Theresa Sullivan, Georgina Charlesworth, Fiona Poland, Martin Orrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Involving service users in research can be an effective way of improving the practicalities and acceptability of interven- tions for target end users.
Objectives The current paper presented two consensus methods, not commonly used in consultation with service users, to develop a peer support intervention for family carers of people with dementia (SHIELD Carer Supporter Programme).
Design Study 1 was a modified Delphi process combined with a consensus conference to explore details of the intervention from the carer and volunteer perspective. Study 2 was an anonymous reader consultation to develop informed consent documents for the intervention trial. Median scores were used to measure and establish consensus. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed.
Setting and participants Study 1: twenty-five delegates partici- pated (eight were current/former carers) in the first round Delphi questionnaire, with 21 attending the conference. Five completed the Round 2 questionnaire. Study 2: six family carers and 11 peo- ple with dementia took part in the consultation.
Results Study 1: the role of the peer supporters was developed in terms of relational and practical aspects of the intervention. Study 2: changes were made to the documents, reflecting service user input, but the effectiveness of this less discursive type of service user involvement was unclear.
Discussion and conclusions Study 1 methods allowed for service users to contribute significantly and meaningfully, but maybe limiting some design innovation. Study 2 took a more traditional and less collaborative approach. This has implications for balanc- ing the needs of the research with meaningful service user involve- ment in research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-110
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume18
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Dementia
Consensus
Referral and Consultation
Research
Consent Forms
Volunteers
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Burnell, Karen ; Selwood, Amber ; Sullivan, Theresa ; Charlesworth, Georgina ; Poland, Fiona ; Orrell, Martin. / Involving service users in the development of the Support at Home: Interventions to Enhance Life in Dementia Carer Supporter Programme for family carers of people with dementia. In: Health Expectations. 2015 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 95-110.
@article{2d9f6bb4c3ee46ab8000983b1594c947,
title = "Involving service users in the development of the Support at Home: Interventions to Enhance Life in Dementia Carer Supporter Programme for family carers of people with dementia.",
abstract = "Background Involving service users in research can be an effective way of improving the practicalities and acceptability of interven- tions for target end users.Objectives The current paper presented two consensus methods, not commonly used in consultation with service users, to develop a peer support intervention for family carers of people with dementia (SHIELD Carer Supporter Programme).Design Study 1 was a modified Delphi process combined with a consensus conference to explore details of the intervention from the carer and volunteer perspective. Study 2 was an anonymous reader consultation to develop informed consent documents for the intervention trial. Median scores were used to measure and establish consensus. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed.Setting and participants Study 1: twenty-five delegates partici- pated (eight were current/former carers) in the first round Delphi questionnaire, with 21 attending the conference. Five completed the Round 2 questionnaire. Study 2: six family carers and 11 peo- ple with dementia took part in the consultation.Results Study 1: the role of the peer supporters was developed in terms of relational and practical aspects of the intervention. Study 2: changes were made to the documents, reflecting service user input, but the effectiveness of this less discursive type of service user involvement was unclear.Discussion and conclusions Study 1 methods allowed for service users to contribute significantly and meaningfully, but maybe limiting some design innovation. Study 2 took a more traditional and less collaborative approach. This has implications for balanc- ing the needs of the research with meaningful service user involve- ment in research.",
author = "Karen Burnell and Amber Selwood and Theresa Sullivan and Georgina Charlesworth and Fiona Poland and Martin Orrell",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "95--110",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Involving service users in the development of the Support at Home: Interventions to Enhance Life in Dementia Carer Supporter Programme for family carers of people with dementia. / Burnell, Karen; Selwood, Amber ; Sullivan, Theresa; Charlesworth, Georgina; Poland, Fiona; Orrell, Martin.

In: Health Expectations, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2015, p. 95-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Involving service users in the development of the Support at Home: Interventions to Enhance Life in Dementia Carer Supporter Programme for family carers of people with dementia.

AU - Burnell, Karen

AU - Selwood, Amber

AU - Sullivan, Theresa

AU - Charlesworth, Georgina

AU - Poland, Fiona

AU - Orrell, Martin

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background Involving service users in research can be an effective way of improving the practicalities and acceptability of interven- tions for target end users.Objectives The current paper presented two consensus methods, not commonly used in consultation with service users, to develop a peer support intervention for family carers of people with dementia (SHIELD Carer Supporter Programme).Design Study 1 was a modified Delphi process combined with a consensus conference to explore details of the intervention from the carer and volunteer perspective. Study 2 was an anonymous reader consultation to develop informed consent documents for the intervention trial. Median scores were used to measure and establish consensus. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed.Setting and participants Study 1: twenty-five delegates partici- pated (eight were current/former carers) in the first round Delphi questionnaire, with 21 attending the conference. Five completed the Round 2 questionnaire. Study 2: six family carers and 11 peo- ple with dementia took part in the consultation.Results Study 1: the role of the peer supporters was developed in terms of relational and practical aspects of the intervention. Study 2: changes were made to the documents, reflecting service user input, but the effectiveness of this less discursive type of service user involvement was unclear.Discussion and conclusions Study 1 methods allowed for service users to contribute significantly and meaningfully, but maybe limiting some design innovation. Study 2 took a more traditional and less collaborative approach. This has implications for balanc- ing the needs of the research with meaningful service user involve- ment in research.

AB - Background Involving service users in research can be an effective way of improving the practicalities and acceptability of interven- tions for target end users.Objectives The current paper presented two consensus methods, not commonly used in consultation with service users, to develop a peer support intervention for family carers of people with dementia (SHIELD Carer Supporter Programme).Design Study 1 was a modified Delphi process combined with a consensus conference to explore details of the intervention from the carer and volunteer perspective. Study 2 was an anonymous reader consultation to develop informed consent documents for the intervention trial. Median scores were used to measure and establish consensus. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed.Setting and participants Study 1: twenty-five delegates partici- pated (eight were current/former carers) in the first round Delphi questionnaire, with 21 attending the conference. Five completed the Round 2 questionnaire. Study 2: six family carers and 11 peo- ple with dementia took part in the consultation.Results Study 1: the role of the peer supporters was developed in terms of relational and practical aspects of the intervention. Study 2: changes were made to the documents, reflecting service user input, but the effectiveness of this less discursive type of service user involvement was unclear.Discussion and conclusions Study 1 methods allowed for service users to contribute significantly and meaningfully, but maybe limiting some design innovation. Study 2 took a more traditional and less collaborative approach. This has implications for balanc- ing the needs of the research with meaningful service user involve- ment in research.

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 95

EP - 110

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 1

ER -