‘I'm just a character in your film’: Acting and Performance from Autism to Zissou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper examines the role of the actor in the Anderson frame and considers the function of performance as a theme and strategy as a way of reading Anderson's films. Considering the relationship between mise-en-scène, the camera and the actor, I establish the actor's agency in the construction of character and narrative. Anderson's films construct other ‘frames’ through which to read performance, including performance-within-performance framing devices and the ensemble. Such techniques call attention to performance as performance, self-consciously foregrounding film and performance as a constructed image that is then echoed by a number of Anderson's narratives. The paper goes on to examine the distinctiveness of acting in Anderson's films, particularly via a ‘deadpan’ style that is exhibited facially and vocally. Finally, these areas are brought together via a discussion of performance in relation to the enactment of male social roles in order to argue that what we witness in Anderson's films is less a ‘blankness’ than an autistic performance of emotion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-67
Number of pages22
JournalNew Review of Film and Television Studies
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

autism
performance
Cameras
Autism
narrative
Social Role
witness
emotion

Cite this

@article{11bb94de9cbd46e5972761c5d31b3240,
title = "‘I'm just a character in your film’: Acting and Performance from Autism to Zissou",
abstract = "This paper examines the role of the actor in the Anderson frame and considers the function of performance as a theme and strategy as a way of reading Anderson's films. Considering the relationship between mise-en-sc{\`e}ne, the camera and the actor, I establish the actor's agency in the construction of character and narrative. Anderson's films construct other ‘frames’ through which to read performance, including performance-within-performance framing devices and the ensemble. Such techniques call attention to performance as performance, self-consciously foregrounding film and performance as a constructed image that is then echoed by a number of Anderson's narratives. The paper goes on to examine the distinctiveness of acting in Anderson's films, particularly via a ‘deadpan’ style that is exhibited facially and vocally. Finally, these areas are brought together via a discussion of performance in relation to the enactment of male social roles in order to argue that what we witness in Anderson's films is less a ‘blankness’ than an autistic performance of emotion.",
author = "Donna Peberdy",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/17400309.2012.631175",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "46--67",
journal = "New Review of Film and Television Studies",
issn = "1740-0309",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘I'm just a character in your film’

T2 - Acting and Performance from Autism to Zissou

AU - Peberdy, Donna

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper examines the role of the actor in the Anderson frame and considers the function of performance as a theme and strategy as a way of reading Anderson's films. Considering the relationship between mise-en-scène, the camera and the actor, I establish the actor's agency in the construction of character and narrative. Anderson's films construct other ‘frames’ through which to read performance, including performance-within-performance framing devices and the ensemble. Such techniques call attention to performance as performance, self-consciously foregrounding film and performance as a constructed image that is then echoed by a number of Anderson's narratives. The paper goes on to examine the distinctiveness of acting in Anderson's films, particularly via a ‘deadpan’ style that is exhibited facially and vocally. Finally, these areas are brought together via a discussion of performance in relation to the enactment of male social roles in order to argue that what we witness in Anderson's films is less a ‘blankness’ than an autistic performance of emotion.

AB - This paper examines the role of the actor in the Anderson frame and considers the function of performance as a theme and strategy as a way of reading Anderson's films. Considering the relationship between mise-en-scène, the camera and the actor, I establish the actor's agency in the construction of character and narrative. Anderson's films construct other ‘frames’ through which to read performance, including performance-within-performance framing devices and the ensemble. Such techniques call attention to performance as performance, self-consciously foregrounding film and performance as a constructed image that is then echoed by a number of Anderson's narratives. The paper goes on to examine the distinctiveness of acting in Anderson's films, particularly via a ‘deadpan’ style that is exhibited facially and vocally. Finally, these areas are brought together via a discussion of performance in relation to the enactment of male social roles in order to argue that what we witness in Anderson's films is less a ‘blankness’ than an autistic performance of emotion.

U2 - 10.1080/17400309.2012.631175

DO - 10.1080/17400309.2012.631175

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 46

EP - 67

JO - New Review of Film and Television Studies

JF - New Review of Film and Television Studies

SN - 1740-0309

IS - 1

ER -