Have we made ourselves clear? Singers and non-singers’ perceptions of the intelligibility of sung text

Philip Fine, Jane Ginsborg, Christopher Barlow

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The intelligibility of sung text is an important component of listeners’
enjoyment of vocal music and a central concern for singers and, for example, choral conductors. Expert listeners such as singers and singing
teachers may be better than non-singers at perceiving sung text. We replicated and extended an earlier study investigating the intelligibility of
semantically and non-semantically meaningful words performed solo
and by a small group of trained soloists by carrying out an experiment in
which we manipulated listening expertise, type of text, number of singers, and time of hearing. Participants listened twice to four songs with
meaningful and “scrambled” lyrics, sung in unison by a choir and solo,
and wrote down as many of the words as they could discern. Singers were
better at the task than non-singers; more words were recorded on the
second hearing and when the words were meaningful. Sung text involves
distortions of consonants and vowels to which singers may be more accustomed, so that they find it easier to discern texts even when scrambled. Choirs may be harder to understand than soloists because their
phonemes are more variable and less clear. In future research we will use
operatically trained soloists and polyphonic choirs.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Symposium on Performance Science 2011
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Singers
Intelligibility
Soloist
Hearing
Solo
Experiment
Conductor
Lyrics
Vocal music
Consonant
Expertise
Unison
Song
Choral
Listeners
Polyphonic

Cite this

Fine, P., Ginsborg, J., & Barlow, C. (2011). Have we made ourselves clear? Singers and non-singers’ perceptions of the intelligibility of sung text. In International Symposium on Performance Science 2011
Fine, Philip ; Ginsborg, Jane ; Barlow, Christopher. / Have we made ourselves clear? Singers and non-singers’ perceptions of the intelligibility of sung text. International Symposium on Performance Science 2011. 2011.
@inproceedings{50e2ceb8d2374529a81c988e061f93f9,
title = "Have we made ourselves clear? Singers and non-singers’ perceptions of the intelligibility of sung text",
abstract = "The intelligibility of sung text is an important component of listeners’enjoyment of vocal music and a central concern for singers and, for example, choral conductors. Expert listeners such as singers and singingteachers may be better than non-singers at perceiving sung text. We replicated and extended an earlier study investigating the intelligibility ofsemantically and non-semantically meaningful words performed soloand by a small group of trained soloists by carrying out an experiment inwhich we manipulated listening expertise, type of text, number of singers, and time of hearing. Participants listened twice to four songs withmeaningful and “scrambled” lyrics, sung in unison by a choir and solo,and wrote down as many of the words as they could discern. Singers werebetter at the task than non-singers; more words were recorded on thesecond hearing and when the words were meaningful. Sung text involvesdistortions of consonants and vowels to which singers may be more accustomed, so that they find it easier to discern texts even when scrambled. Choirs may be harder to understand than soloists because theirphonemes are more variable and less clear. In future research we will useoperatically trained soloists and polyphonic choirs.",
author = "Philip Fine and Jane Ginsborg and Christopher Barlow",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-94-90306-02-1",
booktitle = "International Symposium on Performance Science 2011",

}

Fine, P, Ginsborg, J & Barlow, C 2011, Have we made ourselves clear? Singers and non-singers’ perceptions of the intelligibility of sung text. in International Symposium on Performance Science 2011.

Have we made ourselves clear? Singers and non-singers’ perceptions of the intelligibility of sung text. / Fine, Philip; Ginsborg, Jane; Barlow, Christopher.

International Symposium on Performance Science 2011. 2011.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Have we made ourselves clear? Singers and non-singers’ perceptions of the intelligibility of sung text

AU - Fine, Philip

AU - Ginsborg, Jane

AU - Barlow, Christopher

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The intelligibility of sung text is an important component of listeners’enjoyment of vocal music and a central concern for singers and, for example, choral conductors. Expert listeners such as singers and singingteachers may be better than non-singers at perceiving sung text. We replicated and extended an earlier study investigating the intelligibility ofsemantically and non-semantically meaningful words performed soloand by a small group of trained soloists by carrying out an experiment inwhich we manipulated listening expertise, type of text, number of singers, and time of hearing. Participants listened twice to four songs withmeaningful and “scrambled” lyrics, sung in unison by a choir and solo,and wrote down as many of the words as they could discern. Singers werebetter at the task than non-singers; more words were recorded on thesecond hearing and when the words were meaningful. Sung text involvesdistortions of consonants and vowels to which singers may be more accustomed, so that they find it easier to discern texts even when scrambled. Choirs may be harder to understand than soloists because theirphonemes are more variable and less clear. In future research we will useoperatically trained soloists and polyphonic choirs.

AB - The intelligibility of sung text is an important component of listeners’enjoyment of vocal music and a central concern for singers and, for example, choral conductors. Expert listeners such as singers and singingteachers may be better than non-singers at perceiving sung text. We replicated and extended an earlier study investigating the intelligibility ofsemantically and non-semantically meaningful words performed soloand by a small group of trained soloists by carrying out an experiment inwhich we manipulated listening expertise, type of text, number of singers, and time of hearing. Participants listened twice to four songs withmeaningful and “scrambled” lyrics, sung in unison by a choir and solo,and wrote down as many of the words as they could discern. Singers werebetter at the task than non-singers; more words were recorded on thesecond hearing and when the words were meaningful. Sung text involvesdistortions of consonants and vowels to which singers may be more accustomed, so that they find it easier to discern texts even when scrambled. Choirs may be harder to understand than soloists because theirphonemes are more variable and less clear. In future research we will useoperatically trained soloists and polyphonic choirs.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-94-90306-02-1

BT - International Symposium on Performance Science 2011

ER -

Fine P, Ginsborg J, Barlow C. Have we made ourselves clear? Singers and non-singers’ perceptions of the intelligibility of sung text. In International Symposium on Performance Science 2011. 2011