Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry

Gerald Matthews, Sian E. Campbell, Shona Falconer, Lucy A. Joyner, Jane Huggins, Kirby Gilliland, Rebecca Grier, Joel S. Warm

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Subjective state constructs are defined within the traditional domains of affect, motivation, and cognition. Currently, there is no overarching state model that interrelates constructs within the different domains. This article reports 3 studies that provide converging evidence for 3 fundamental state dimensions labeled task engagement, distress, and worry that integrate constructs across the traditional domains. Study 1 differentiated the state dimensions by factor analysis of the scales of the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (G. Matthews et al., 1999). Study 2 showed differential state response to performance of tasks making different cognitive demands. Study 3 showed that states are correlated with differing patterns of appraisal and coping. The 3 stress state dimensions provide a general descriptive framework consistent with transactional accounts of stress and performance
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)315-340
    Number of pages26
    JournalEmotion
    Volume2
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L. A., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., Grier, R., & Warm, J. S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion, 2(4), 315-340. https://doi.org/10.1037//1528-3542.2.4.315