From Wimps to Wild Men: Bipolar Masculinity and the Paradoxical Performances of Tom Cruise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the performative and paradoxical relationship between masculine opposites—hard and soft, hypermasculinity and hypomasculinity—as presented through the figures of the Wild Man and Wimp. Rather than shifting from hard to soft at different historical moments, as has been argued by scholars such as Susan Jeffords, Fred Pfeil, as well as poet and activist Robert Bly, the article suggests that masculinity is bipolar, simultaneously exhibiting hard and soft modes. Tom Cruise offers a particularly indicative example, moving between hard and soft, Wild Man and Wimp, both on-screen and offscreen. In Magnolia, Cruise’s movement from Frank T.J. Mackey’s manic misogyny to Jack’s emotional hysteria at his father’s bedside presents masculinity as a performance, extending past the cinematic stage to his televisual performances to Oprah, Jay Leno, and Matt Lauer. Cruise offers a clear example where movement too far in either direction can undermine the male ‘‘norm,’’ yet underscores the bipolar nature of masculinity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-254
Number of pages23
JournalMen and Masculinities
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

masculinity
performance
father
writer
Masculinity
Wild Man
Tom Cruise
Hysteria
Indicative
Masculine
Misogyny
Emotion
Poet
Activists

Cite this

@article{b40830900d5a41038271d23cfdd4c440,
title = "From Wimps to Wild Men: Bipolar Masculinity and the Paradoxical Performances of Tom Cruise",
abstract = "This article examines the performative and paradoxical relationship between masculine opposites—hard and soft, hypermasculinity and hypomasculinity—as presented through the figures of the Wild Man and Wimp. Rather than shifting from hard to soft at different historical moments, as has been argued by scholars such as Susan Jeffords, Fred Pfeil, as well as poet and activist Robert Bly, the article suggests that masculinity is bipolar, simultaneously exhibiting hard and soft modes. Tom Cruise offers a particularly indicative example, moving between hard and soft, Wild Man and Wimp, both on-screen and offscreen. In Magnolia, Cruise’s movement from Frank T.J. Mackey’s manic misogyny to Jack’s emotional hysteria at his father’s bedside presents masculinity as a performance, extending past the cinematic stage to his televisual performances to Oprah, Jay Leno, and Matt Lauer. Cruise offers a clear example where movement too far in either direction can undermine the male ‘‘norm,’’ yet underscores the bipolar nature of masculinity.",
author = "Donna Peberdy",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1177/1097184X09359500",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "231--254",
journal = "Men and Masculinities",
issn = "1097-184X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

From Wimps to Wild Men : Bipolar Masculinity and the Paradoxical Performances of Tom Cruise. / Peberdy, Donna.

In: Men and Masculinities, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2010, p. 231-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Wimps to Wild Men

T2 - Bipolar Masculinity and the Paradoxical Performances of Tom Cruise

AU - Peberdy, Donna

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This article examines the performative and paradoxical relationship between masculine opposites—hard and soft, hypermasculinity and hypomasculinity—as presented through the figures of the Wild Man and Wimp. Rather than shifting from hard to soft at different historical moments, as has been argued by scholars such as Susan Jeffords, Fred Pfeil, as well as poet and activist Robert Bly, the article suggests that masculinity is bipolar, simultaneously exhibiting hard and soft modes. Tom Cruise offers a particularly indicative example, moving between hard and soft, Wild Man and Wimp, both on-screen and offscreen. In Magnolia, Cruise’s movement from Frank T.J. Mackey’s manic misogyny to Jack’s emotional hysteria at his father’s bedside presents masculinity as a performance, extending past the cinematic stage to his televisual performances to Oprah, Jay Leno, and Matt Lauer. Cruise offers a clear example where movement too far in either direction can undermine the male ‘‘norm,’’ yet underscores the bipolar nature of masculinity.

AB - This article examines the performative and paradoxical relationship between masculine opposites—hard and soft, hypermasculinity and hypomasculinity—as presented through the figures of the Wild Man and Wimp. Rather than shifting from hard to soft at different historical moments, as has been argued by scholars such as Susan Jeffords, Fred Pfeil, as well as poet and activist Robert Bly, the article suggests that masculinity is bipolar, simultaneously exhibiting hard and soft modes. Tom Cruise offers a particularly indicative example, moving between hard and soft, Wild Man and Wimp, both on-screen and offscreen. In Magnolia, Cruise’s movement from Frank T.J. Mackey’s manic misogyny to Jack’s emotional hysteria at his father’s bedside presents masculinity as a performance, extending past the cinematic stage to his televisual performances to Oprah, Jay Leno, and Matt Lauer. Cruise offers a clear example where movement too far in either direction can undermine the male ‘‘norm,’’ yet underscores the bipolar nature of masculinity.

U2 - 10.1177/1097184X09359500

DO - 10.1177/1097184X09359500

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 231

EP - 254

JO - Men and Masculinities

JF - Men and Masculinities

SN - 1097-184X

IS - 2

ER -