Freedom of Association: a comparison of China and US Approachesto International Labour Organisation Standards

Clifford Donn, Minghua Zhao

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Abstract

Freedom of association has long been viewed as the most basic of labour rights.1 This is because it represents the ability of working people to work for the improvement of their status themselves. Accordingly, it has had a unique status at the International Labour Organization (ILO). Economist Kimberly Elliott points out its special status within the ILO supervisory system:

Because it is regarded as a fundamental constitutional obligation of all members, however, complaints regarding violations of freedom of association may be brought against any member government, regardless of convention ratification status, and referred to the Committee on Freedom of Association for review.2
The fundamental principle of freedom of association corresponds to two ILO Conventions, which now belong to the eight so-called core Conventions as defined by the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work from 1998. The first is the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87). 3 It has been ratified to date by 153 countries, but neither by China nor the United States.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe ILO from Geneva to the Pacific Rim
Subtitle of host publicationWest Meets East
EditorsJill M Jensen, Nelson Lichtenstein
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Pages251-276
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-137-57090-1
ISBN (Print)978-1-349-57592-3
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Publication series

NameInternational Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan, London

Fingerprint

freedom of association
ILO
China
ratification
complaint
economist
obligation
labor
ability

Cite this

Donn, C., & Zhao, M. (2016). Freedom of Association: a comparison of China and US Approachesto International Labour Organisation Standards. In J. M. Jensen, & N. Lichtenstein (Eds.), The ILO from Geneva to the Pacific Rim: West Meets East (pp. 251-276). [Chapter 11] (International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series ). London : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd..
Donn, Clifford ; Zhao, Minghua. / Freedom of Association: a comparison of China and US Approachesto International Labour Organisation Standards. The ILO from Geneva to the Pacific Rim: West Meets East. editor / Jill M Jensen ; Nelson Lichtenstein. London : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2016. pp. 251-276 (International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series ).
@inbook{92426848fb8e4f46b159dd8762d2a789,
title = "Freedom of Association: a comparison of China and US Approachesto International Labour Organisation Standards",
abstract = "AbstractFreedom of association has long been viewed as the most basic of labour rights.1 This is because it represents the ability of working people to work for the improvement of their status themselves. Accordingly, it has had a unique status at the International Labour Organization (ILO). Economist Kimberly Elliott points out its special status within the ILO supervisory system: Because it is regarded as a fundamental constitutional obligation of all members, however, complaints regarding violations of freedom of association may be brought against any member government, regardless of convention ratification status, and referred to the Committee on Freedom of Association for review.2The fundamental principle of freedom of association corresponds to two ILO Conventions, which now belong to the eight so-called core Conventions as defined by the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work from 1998. The first is the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87). 3 It has been ratified to date by 153 countries, but neither by China nor the United States.",
author = "Clifford Donn and Minghua Zhao",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-349-57592-3",
series = "International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
pages = "251--276",
editor = "Jensen, {Jill M} and Nelson Lichtenstein",
booktitle = "The ILO from Geneva to the Pacific Rim",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Donn, C & Zhao, M 2016, Freedom of Association: a comparison of China and US Approachesto International Labour Organisation Standards. in JM Jensen & N Lichtenstein (eds), The ILO from Geneva to the Pacific Rim: West Meets East., Chapter 11, International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series , Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., London , pp. 251-276.

Freedom of Association: a comparison of China and US Approachesto International Labour Organisation Standards. / Donn, Clifford; Zhao, Minghua.

The ILO from Geneva to the Pacific Rim: West Meets East. ed. / Jill M Jensen; Nelson Lichtenstein. London : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2016. p. 251-276 Chapter 11 (International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series ).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Freedom of Association: a comparison of China and US Approachesto International Labour Organisation Standards

AU - Donn, Clifford

AU - Zhao, Minghua

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - AbstractFreedom of association has long been viewed as the most basic of labour rights.1 This is because it represents the ability of working people to work for the improvement of their status themselves. Accordingly, it has had a unique status at the International Labour Organization (ILO). Economist Kimberly Elliott points out its special status within the ILO supervisory system: Because it is regarded as a fundamental constitutional obligation of all members, however, complaints regarding violations of freedom of association may be brought against any member government, regardless of convention ratification status, and referred to the Committee on Freedom of Association for review.2The fundamental principle of freedom of association corresponds to two ILO Conventions, which now belong to the eight so-called core Conventions as defined by the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work from 1998. The first is the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87). 3 It has been ratified to date by 153 countries, but neither by China nor the United States.

AB - AbstractFreedom of association has long been viewed as the most basic of labour rights.1 This is because it represents the ability of working people to work for the improvement of their status themselves. Accordingly, it has had a unique status at the International Labour Organization (ILO). Economist Kimberly Elliott points out its special status within the ILO supervisory system: Because it is regarded as a fundamental constitutional obligation of all members, however, complaints regarding violations of freedom of association may be brought against any member government, regardless of convention ratification status, and referred to the Committee on Freedom of Association for review.2The fundamental principle of freedom of association corresponds to two ILO Conventions, which now belong to the eight so-called core Conventions as defined by the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work from 1998. The first is the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87). 3 It has been ratified to date by 153 countries, but neither by China nor the United States.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-349-57592-3

T3 - International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series

SP - 251

EP - 276

BT - The ILO from Geneva to the Pacific Rim

A2 - Jensen, Jill M

A2 - Lichtenstein, Nelson

PB - Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

CY - London

ER -

Donn C, Zhao M. Freedom of Association: a comparison of China and US Approachesto International Labour Organisation Standards. In Jensen JM, Lichtenstein N, editors, The ILO from Geneva to the Pacific Rim: West Meets East. London : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. 2016. p. 251-276. Chapter 11. (International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series ).