Flexibility, Security and the Need for Training

Polina Baum-Talmor, Victor Gekara

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

As a result of extensive restructuring in the global labour market for seafarers, driven by ship owners’ drive to achieve reduced operations cost and increased profitability, seafarers are increasingly being employed under precarious and unstable circumstances. In place of long-term, secure employment, most seafarers are now employed on a short-term and temporary basis. In defence of growing temporary voyage-based engagement for seafarers, some people maintain that such arrangements, as applied in other sectors such as banking and IT, provide the kind of employment flexibility befitting the notional 21st Century flexible worker, in full control of their career destinies. We ask here, however, whether the emerging global shipping landscape, the resulting power relations between owners and seafarers and the changing level of employer commitment to training and staff development enables the suggested benefits of employment flexibility. In establishing our critique of the emerging employment arrangement for seafarers, we suggest that the benefits of flexibility argument is simply a convenient construction by ship owners and their satellite recruitment agencies to justify sweeping changes in the industry which adversely affect the social-economic wellbeing of seafarers associated with traditional long-term secure employment arrangements.
Original languageEnglish
TypePaper in professional journal
Media of outputWritten paper
PublisherSeaways - The Nautical Institute Magazine
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

flexibility
shipping
profitability
social economics
banking
restructuring
employer
labor market
career
commitment
staff
worker
industry
costs

Cite this

Baum-Talmor, P., & Gekara, V. (2015). Flexibility, Security and the Need for Training. Seaways - The Nautical Institute Magazine.
Baum-Talmor, Polina ; Gekara, Victor. / Flexibility, Security and the Need for Training. 2015. Seaways - The Nautical Institute Magazine. 2 p.
@misc{41d4a319b312459e85596b02d6efe513,
title = "Flexibility, Security and the Need for Training",
abstract = "As a result of extensive restructuring in the global labour market for seafarers, driven by ship owners’ drive to achieve reduced operations cost and increased profitability, seafarers are increasingly being employed under precarious and unstable circumstances. In place of long-term, secure employment, most seafarers are now employed on a short-term and temporary basis. In defence of growing temporary voyage-based engagement for seafarers, some people maintain that such arrangements, as applied in other sectors such as banking and IT, provide the kind of employment flexibility befitting the notional 21st Century flexible worker, in full control of their career destinies. We ask here, however, whether the emerging global shipping landscape, the resulting power relations between owners and seafarers and the changing level of employer commitment to training and staff development enables the suggested benefits of employment flexibility. In establishing our critique of the emerging employment arrangement for seafarers, we suggest that the benefits of flexibility argument is simply a convenient construction by ship owners and their satellite recruitment agencies to justify sweeping changes in the industry which adversely affect the social-economic wellbeing of seafarers associated with traditional long-term secure employment arrangements.",
author = "Polina Baum-Talmor and Victor Gekara",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
publisher = "Seaways - The Nautical Institute Magazine",
type = "Other",

}

Baum-Talmor, P & Gekara, V 2015, Flexibility, Security and the Need for Training. Seaways - The Nautical Institute Magazine.

Flexibility, Security and the Need for Training. / Baum-Talmor, Polina; Gekara, Victor.

2 p. Seaways - The Nautical Institute Magazine. 2015, Paper in professional journal.

Research output: Other contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Flexibility, Security and the Need for Training

AU - Baum-Talmor, Polina

AU - Gekara, Victor

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - As a result of extensive restructuring in the global labour market for seafarers, driven by ship owners’ drive to achieve reduced operations cost and increased profitability, seafarers are increasingly being employed under precarious and unstable circumstances. In place of long-term, secure employment, most seafarers are now employed on a short-term and temporary basis. In defence of growing temporary voyage-based engagement for seafarers, some people maintain that such arrangements, as applied in other sectors such as banking and IT, provide the kind of employment flexibility befitting the notional 21st Century flexible worker, in full control of their career destinies. We ask here, however, whether the emerging global shipping landscape, the resulting power relations between owners and seafarers and the changing level of employer commitment to training and staff development enables the suggested benefits of employment flexibility. In establishing our critique of the emerging employment arrangement for seafarers, we suggest that the benefits of flexibility argument is simply a convenient construction by ship owners and their satellite recruitment agencies to justify sweeping changes in the industry which adversely affect the social-economic wellbeing of seafarers associated with traditional long-term secure employment arrangements.

AB - As a result of extensive restructuring in the global labour market for seafarers, driven by ship owners’ drive to achieve reduced operations cost and increased profitability, seafarers are increasingly being employed under precarious and unstable circumstances. In place of long-term, secure employment, most seafarers are now employed on a short-term and temporary basis. In defence of growing temporary voyage-based engagement for seafarers, some people maintain that such arrangements, as applied in other sectors such as banking and IT, provide the kind of employment flexibility befitting the notional 21st Century flexible worker, in full control of their career destinies. We ask here, however, whether the emerging global shipping landscape, the resulting power relations between owners and seafarers and the changing level of employer commitment to training and staff development enables the suggested benefits of employment flexibility. In establishing our critique of the emerging employment arrangement for seafarers, we suggest that the benefits of flexibility argument is simply a convenient construction by ship owners and their satellite recruitment agencies to justify sweeping changes in the industry which adversely affect the social-economic wellbeing of seafarers associated with traditional long-term secure employment arrangements.

M3 - Other contribution

PB - Seaways - The Nautical Institute Magazine

ER -