TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of resistance training set volume on upper-body muscle hypertrophy
T2 - are more sets really better than less?
AU - La Scala Teixeira, Cauê V
AU - Motoyama, Yuri
AU - de Azevedo, Paulo Henrique Silva Marques
AU - Bocalini, Danilo Sales
AU - Steele, James
PY - 2017/10/11
Y1 - 2017/10/11
N2 - Background
Resistance training (RT) for upper body muscle hypertrophy (UBMH) typically entails high volumes of sets per muscle group per training session. The majority of RT regimens does not discriminate between upper and lower body muscle groups, while these groups may respond differently to RT set volumes in terms of maximum skeletal muscle mass gain. Recent studies have examined the effect of different set volumes on the extent of UBMH to formulate optimal RT regimens and to make RT programmes more time‐efficient.
Objective
To analyse the effect of the number of RT sets on the extent of UBMH on the basis of recent literature.
Results and conclusion
The analysis suggests that, statistically, high set volumes (≥3) are not significantly better than low set volumes (<3) in regard to UBMH in untrained subjects. For trained subjects, the literature is lacking in well‐designed studies comparing low and high training volumes, as well as analysing upper and lower body muscles separately. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude that high volume of sets offers better results than low volume of sets for UBMH, and vice versa.
AB - Background
Resistance training (RT) for upper body muscle hypertrophy (UBMH) typically entails high volumes of sets per muscle group per training session. The majority of RT regimens does not discriminate between upper and lower body muscle groups, while these groups may respond differently to RT set volumes in terms of maximum skeletal muscle mass gain. Recent studies have examined the effect of different set volumes on the extent of UBMH to formulate optimal RT regimens and to make RT programmes more time‐efficient.
Objective
To analyse the effect of the number of RT sets on the extent of UBMH on the basis of recent literature.
Results and conclusion
The analysis suggests that, statistically, high set volumes (≥3) are not significantly better than low set volumes (<3) in regard to UBMH in untrained subjects. For trained subjects, the literature is lacking in well‐designed studies comparing low and high training volumes, as well as analysing upper and lower body muscles separately. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude that high volume of sets offers better results than low volume of sets for UBMH, and vice versa.
U2 - 10.1111/cpf.12476
DO - 10.1111/cpf.12476
M3 - Article
SN - 1475-0961
VL - 38
SP - 727
EP - 732
JO - Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
JF - Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
IS - 5
ER -