Drawing Queer: Lines of difference, going astray and the undiminished jaggy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Within this chapter, I consider the limitations of the line when attempting to draw queer. Relating this to Butler’s suggestion that it is the endless repetition and reiteration of particular ideas that leads to identity or fixed categorisation. What happens to the line that has been endlessly reformulated and reiterated as straight? What will be ‘the very expressions that are said to be its results’? In contrast to Euclid’s positing of the straight line as being without limit, this paper suggests that the cultural definitions that have been imposed upon the line as straightening devices, have brought about significant limits and that these limits have implications, as inhibitors to what a line can express. This makes the queering of lines an imperative, so as to ‘open up the field of possibility... without dictating which kinds of possibilities ought to be realised.’ (Butler 2006)
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInvisible Identity and The Creative Act
PublisherVernon Press
Publication statusIn preparation - 2018

Cite this

Chamberlain, N. (2018). Drawing Queer: Lines of difference, going astray and the undiminished jaggy. Manuscript in preparation. In Invisible Identity and The Creative Act Vernon Press.
Chamberlain, Nicola. / Drawing Queer : Lines of difference, going astray and the undiminished jaggy. Invisible Identity and The Creative Act. Vernon Press, 2018.
@inbook{9807ede19c3e49809c93f80cb86bb72e,
title = "Drawing Queer: Lines of difference, going astray and the undiminished jaggy",
abstract = "Within this chapter, I consider the limitations of the line when attempting to draw queer. Relating this to Butler’s suggestion that it is the endless repetition and reiteration of particular ideas that leads to identity or fixed categorisation. What happens to the line that has been endlessly reformulated and reiterated as straight? What will be ‘the very expressions that are said to be its results’? In contrast to Euclid’s positing of the straight line as being without limit, this paper suggests that the cultural definitions that have been imposed upon the line as straightening devices, have brought about significant limits and that these limits have implications, as inhibitors to what a line can express. This makes the queering of lines an imperative, so as to ‘open up the field of possibility... without dictating which kinds of possibilities ought to be realised.’ (Butler 2006)",
author = "Nicola Chamberlain",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Invisible Identity and The Creative Act",
publisher = "Vernon Press",

}

Chamberlain, N 2018, Drawing Queer: Lines of difference, going astray and the undiminished jaggy. in Invisible Identity and The Creative Act. Vernon Press.

Drawing Queer : Lines of difference, going astray and the undiminished jaggy. / Chamberlain, Nicola.

Invisible Identity and The Creative Act. Vernon Press, 2018.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Drawing Queer

T2 - Lines of difference, going astray and the undiminished jaggy

AU - Chamberlain, Nicola

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Within this chapter, I consider the limitations of the line when attempting to draw queer. Relating this to Butler’s suggestion that it is the endless repetition and reiteration of particular ideas that leads to identity or fixed categorisation. What happens to the line that has been endlessly reformulated and reiterated as straight? What will be ‘the very expressions that are said to be its results’? In contrast to Euclid’s positing of the straight line as being without limit, this paper suggests that the cultural definitions that have been imposed upon the line as straightening devices, have brought about significant limits and that these limits have implications, as inhibitors to what a line can express. This makes the queering of lines an imperative, so as to ‘open up the field of possibility... without dictating which kinds of possibilities ought to be realised.’ (Butler 2006)

AB - Within this chapter, I consider the limitations of the line when attempting to draw queer. Relating this to Butler’s suggestion that it is the endless repetition and reiteration of particular ideas that leads to identity or fixed categorisation. What happens to the line that has been endlessly reformulated and reiterated as straight? What will be ‘the very expressions that are said to be its results’? In contrast to Euclid’s positing of the straight line as being without limit, this paper suggests that the cultural definitions that have been imposed upon the line as straightening devices, have brought about significant limits and that these limits have implications, as inhibitors to what a line can express. This makes the queering of lines an imperative, so as to ‘open up the field of possibility... without dictating which kinds of possibilities ought to be realised.’ (Butler 2006)

M3 - Chapter

BT - Invisible Identity and The Creative Act

PB - Vernon Press

ER -

Chamberlain N. Drawing Queer: Lines of difference, going astray and the undiminished jaggy. In Invisible Identity and The Creative Act. Vernon Press. 2018