Clarity in Reporting Terminology and Definitions of Set End Points in Resistance Training

James Steele, James Fisher, Jürgen Giessing, Paulo Gentil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Prior resistance training (RT) recommendations and position stands have discussed variables that can be manipulated when producing RT interventions. However, one variable that has received little discussion is set end points (i.e. the end point of a set of repetitions). Set end points in RT are often considered to be proximity to momentary failure and are thought to be a primary variable determining effort in RT. Further, there has been ambiguity in use and definition of terminology that has created issues in interpretation of research findings. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) provide an overview of the ambiguity in historical terminology around set end points; 2) propose a clearer set of definitions related to set end points; and 3) highlight the issues created by poor terminology and definitions. It is hoped this might permit greater clarity in reporting, interpretation, and application of RT interventions for researchers and practitioners.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-374
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume56
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Terminology
Research Personnel
Research

Cite this

@article{fc7b7f7abd964ecb8f0d529ace0d62af,
title = "Clarity in Reporting Terminology and Definitions of Set End Points in Resistance Training",
abstract = "Prior resistance training (RT) recommendations and position stands have discussed variables that can be manipulated when producing RT interventions. However, one variable that has received little discussion is set end points (i.e. the end point of a set of repetitions). Set end points in RT are often considered to be proximity to momentary failure and are thought to be a primary variable determining effort in RT. Further, there has been ambiguity in use and definition of terminology that has created issues in interpretation of research findings. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) provide an overview of the ambiguity in historical terminology around set end points; 2) propose a clearer set of definitions related to set end points; and 3) highlight the issues created by poor terminology and definitions. It is hoped this might permit greater clarity in reporting, interpretation, and application of RT interventions for researchers and practitioners.",
author = "James Steele and James Fisher and J{\"u}rgen Giessing and Paulo Gentil",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "368--374",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Clarity in Reporting Terminology and Definitions of Set End Points in Resistance Training. / Steele, James; Fisher, James; Giessing, Jürgen; Gentil, Paulo.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2017, p. 368-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clarity in Reporting Terminology and Definitions of Set End Points in Resistance Training

AU - Steele, James

AU - Fisher, James

AU - Giessing, Jürgen

AU - Gentil, Paulo

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Prior resistance training (RT) recommendations and position stands have discussed variables that can be manipulated when producing RT interventions. However, one variable that has received little discussion is set end points (i.e. the end point of a set of repetitions). Set end points in RT are often considered to be proximity to momentary failure and are thought to be a primary variable determining effort in RT. Further, there has been ambiguity in use and definition of terminology that has created issues in interpretation of research findings. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) provide an overview of the ambiguity in historical terminology around set end points; 2) propose a clearer set of definitions related to set end points; and 3) highlight the issues created by poor terminology and definitions. It is hoped this might permit greater clarity in reporting, interpretation, and application of RT interventions for researchers and practitioners.

AB - Prior resistance training (RT) recommendations and position stands have discussed variables that can be manipulated when producing RT interventions. However, one variable that has received little discussion is set end points (i.e. the end point of a set of repetitions). Set end points in RT are often considered to be proximity to momentary failure and are thought to be a primary variable determining effort in RT. Further, there has been ambiguity in use and definition of terminology that has created issues in interpretation of research findings. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) provide an overview of the ambiguity in historical terminology around set end points; 2) propose a clearer set of definitions related to set end points; and 3) highlight the issues created by poor terminology and definitions. It is hoped this might permit greater clarity in reporting, interpretation, and application of RT interventions for researchers and practitioners.

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 368

EP - 374

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 3

ER -