Beyond winners and losers in assessment and feedback

Tansy Jessop, Gwyneth Hughes

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    This chapter explores the relationship between findings from two assessment projects funded by the HEA and JISC between 2009 and 2014 at two different universities. The projects were unrelated in design, approach and intention. TESTA focused a wide-angled lens on modular degrees to gain a programme perspective of seven undergraduate programmes at four universities, while Assessment Careers examined the effectiveness of feedback on five postgraduate programmes at the then Institute of Education. The outcomes of both projects gave surprisingly similar interpretations of the problems with assessment and feedback. Modularisation limited students’ capacities to use feedback and see connections across the whole programme of study because learning was compartmentalised; high levels of assessment fed a competitive culture; and disconnected and ineffective feedback impeded student learning. This chapter explores these problems, and demonstrates strategies and approaches which have worked to breach the walls of modular degrees and build a connected and meaningful experience where all students can achieve their ‘personal best’.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationTeaching and Learning in Higher Education
    Subtitle of host publicationPerspectives from UCL
    EditorsJason Davies, Norbert Pachler
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherUCL IOE Press
    Chapter5
    Pages64-83
    Number of pages21
    ISBN (Print)9781782772552
    Publication statusPublished - 4 Jun 2018

    Fingerprint

    modularization
    program of study
    university
    student
    learning
    career
    interpretation
    education
    experience

    Cite this

    Jessop, T., & Hughes, G. (2018). Beyond winners and losers in assessment and feedback. In J. Davies, & N. Pachler (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL (pp. 64-83). London: UCL IOE Press.
    Jessop, Tansy ; Hughes, Gwyneth. / Beyond winners and losers in assessment and feedback. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL. editor / Jason Davies ; Norbert Pachler. London : UCL IOE Press, 2018. pp. 64-83
    @inbook{d936a16d323f40a696c2c7945d5925fa,
    title = "Beyond winners and losers in assessment and feedback",
    abstract = "This chapter explores the relationship between findings from two assessment projects funded by the HEA and JISC between 2009 and 2014 at two different universities. The projects were unrelated in design, approach and intention. TESTA focused a wide-angled lens on modular degrees to gain a programme perspective of seven undergraduate programmes at four universities, while Assessment Careers examined the effectiveness of feedback on five postgraduate programmes at the then Institute of Education. The outcomes of both projects gave surprisingly similar interpretations of the problems with assessment and feedback. Modularisation limited students’ capacities to use feedback and see connections across the whole programme of study because learning was compartmentalised; high levels of assessment fed a competitive culture; and disconnected and ineffective feedback impeded student learning. This chapter explores these problems, and demonstrates strategies and approaches which have worked to breach the walls of modular degrees and build a connected and meaningful experience where all students can achieve their ‘personal best’.",
    author = "Tansy Jessop and Gwyneth Hughes",
    year = "2018",
    month = "6",
    day = "4",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781782772552",
    pages = "64--83",
    editor = "Jason Davies and Norbert Pachler",
    booktitle = "Teaching and Learning in Higher Education",
    publisher = "UCL IOE Press",

    }

    Jessop, T & Hughes, G 2018, Beyond winners and losers in assessment and feedback. in J Davies & N Pachler (eds), Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL. UCL IOE Press, London, pp. 64-83.

    Beyond winners and losers in assessment and feedback. / Jessop, Tansy; Hughes, Gwyneth.

    Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL. ed. / Jason Davies; Norbert Pachler. London : UCL IOE Press, 2018. p. 64-83.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Published conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Beyond winners and losers in assessment and feedback

    AU - Jessop, Tansy

    AU - Hughes, Gwyneth

    PY - 2018/6/4

    Y1 - 2018/6/4

    N2 - This chapter explores the relationship between findings from two assessment projects funded by the HEA and JISC between 2009 and 2014 at two different universities. The projects were unrelated in design, approach and intention. TESTA focused a wide-angled lens on modular degrees to gain a programme perspective of seven undergraduate programmes at four universities, while Assessment Careers examined the effectiveness of feedback on five postgraduate programmes at the then Institute of Education. The outcomes of both projects gave surprisingly similar interpretations of the problems with assessment and feedback. Modularisation limited students’ capacities to use feedback and see connections across the whole programme of study because learning was compartmentalised; high levels of assessment fed a competitive culture; and disconnected and ineffective feedback impeded student learning. This chapter explores these problems, and demonstrates strategies and approaches which have worked to breach the walls of modular degrees and build a connected and meaningful experience where all students can achieve their ‘personal best’.

    AB - This chapter explores the relationship between findings from two assessment projects funded by the HEA and JISC between 2009 and 2014 at two different universities. The projects were unrelated in design, approach and intention. TESTA focused a wide-angled lens on modular degrees to gain a programme perspective of seven undergraduate programmes at four universities, while Assessment Careers examined the effectiveness of feedback on five postgraduate programmes at the then Institute of Education. The outcomes of both projects gave surprisingly similar interpretations of the problems with assessment and feedback. Modularisation limited students’ capacities to use feedback and see connections across the whole programme of study because learning was compartmentalised; high levels of assessment fed a competitive culture; and disconnected and ineffective feedback impeded student learning. This chapter explores these problems, and demonstrates strategies and approaches which have worked to breach the walls of modular degrees and build a connected and meaningful experience where all students can achieve their ‘personal best’.

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781782772552

    SP - 64

    EP - 83

    BT - Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

    A2 - Davies, Jason

    A2 - Pachler, Norbert

    PB - UCL IOE Press

    CY - London

    ER -

    Jessop T, Hughes G. Beyond winners and losers in assessment and feedback. In Davies J, Pachler N, editors, Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL. London: UCL IOE Press. 2018. p. 64-83