Auditory Hindsight Bias: Fluency Misattribution Versus Memory Reconstruction

P.A. Higham, G.J. Neil, D.M. Bernstein

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    60 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We report 4 experiments investigating auditory hindsight bias – the tendency to overestimate the intelligibility of distorted auditory stimuli after learning their identity. An associative priming manipulation was used to vary the amount of processing fluency independently of prior target knowledge. For hypothetical designs, in which hindsight judgments are made for peers in foresight, we predicted that judgments would be based on processing fluency and that hindsight bias would be greater in the unrelated- compared to related-prime context (differential-fluency hypothesis). Conversely, for memory designs, in which foresight judgments are remembered in hindsight, we predicted that judgments would be based on memory reconstruction and that there would be independent effects of prime relatedness and prior target knowledge (recollection hypothesis). These predictions were confirmed. Specifically, we found support for the differential-fluency hypothesis when a hypothetical design was used in Experiments 1 and 2 (hypothetical group). Conversely, when a memory design was used in Experiments 2 (memory group), 3A and 3B, we found support for the recollection hypothesis. Together, the results suggest that qualitatively different mechanisms create hindsight bias in the two designs. The results are discussed in terms of fluency misattributions, memory reconstruction, anchoring-and-adjustment, sense making, and a multi-component model of hindsight bias.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1144-1159
    JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
    Volume43
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Auditory Hindsight Bias: Fluency Misattribution Versus Memory Reconstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this