Attitudes toward and preferences for male and female personal trainers

James Fisher, Catherine Platts, Marie Stopforth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous research has considered the perceptions of athletes towards gender of coach and strength and conditioning coach. However, to date there appears little research considering the perceptions of clients towards gender of personal trainer. The purpose of this study was to investigate male and females perceptions of same- or opposite-gender personal trainers. Four hundred and two (male = 201, female = 201) undergraduate University student participants completed an adapted version of the Attitudes of Athletes toward Male versus Female Coaches Questionnaire (AAMFCQ; 23). A 2 x 2 multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that neither males nor females showed any preference for gender of hypothetical personal trainer (p > 0.05) although both males and females reported that a personal trainer of the opposite gender might make it harder to concentrate (p <0.05). Previous research has reported a preference for male coaches/strength and conditioning coaches from both male and female athletes. However, this study suggests that there is no such gender bias towards personal trainers in this population.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-268
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Exercise Science
Volume6
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

coach
gender
athlete
conditioning
analysis of variance
multivariate analysis
questionnaire
trend
student

Cite this

Fisher, James ; Platts, Catherine ; Stopforth, Marie. / Attitudes toward and preferences for male and female personal trainers. In: International Journal of Exercise Science. 2013 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 256-268.
@article{8de241d1941f4fb2848b11618c229db8,
title = "Attitudes toward and preferences for male and female personal trainers",
abstract = "Previous research has considered the perceptions of athletes towards gender of coach and strength and conditioning coach. However, to date there appears little research considering the perceptions of clients towards gender of personal trainer. The purpose of this study was to investigate male and females perceptions of same- or opposite-gender personal trainers. Four hundred and two (male = 201, female = 201) undergraduate University student participants completed an adapted version of the Attitudes of Athletes toward Male versus Female Coaches Questionnaire (AAMFCQ; 23). A 2 x 2 multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that neither males nor females showed any preference for gender of hypothetical personal trainer (p > 0.05) although both males and females reported that a personal trainer of the opposite gender might make it harder to concentrate (p <0.05). Previous research has reported a preference for male coaches/strength and conditioning coaches from both male and female athletes. However, this study suggests that there is no such gender bias towards personal trainers in this population.",
author = "James Fisher and Catherine Platts and Marie Stopforth",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "256--268",
journal = "International Journal of Exercise Science",
number = "4",

}

Attitudes toward and preferences for male and female personal trainers. / Fisher, James; Platts, Catherine; Stopforth, Marie.

In: International Journal of Exercise Science, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2013, p. 256-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes toward and preferences for male and female personal trainers

AU - Fisher, James

AU - Platts, Catherine

AU - Stopforth, Marie

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Previous research has considered the perceptions of athletes towards gender of coach and strength and conditioning coach. However, to date there appears little research considering the perceptions of clients towards gender of personal trainer. The purpose of this study was to investigate male and females perceptions of same- or opposite-gender personal trainers. Four hundred and two (male = 201, female = 201) undergraduate University student participants completed an adapted version of the Attitudes of Athletes toward Male versus Female Coaches Questionnaire (AAMFCQ; 23). A 2 x 2 multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that neither males nor females showed any preference for gender of hypothetical personal trainer (p > 0.05) although both males and females reported that a personal trainer of the opposite gender might make it harder to concentrate (p <0.05). Previous research has reported a preference for male coaches/strength and conditioning coaches from both male and female athletes. However, this study suggests that there is no such gender bias towards personal trainers in this population.

AB - Previous research has considered the perceptions of athletes towards gender of coach and strength and conditioning coach. However, to date there appears little research considering the perceptions of clients towards gender of personal trainer. The purpose of this study was to investigate male and females perceptions of same- or opposite-gender personal trainers. Four hundred and two (male = 201, female = 201) undergraduate University student participants completed an adapted version of the Attitudes of Athletes toward Male versus Female Coaches Questionnaire (AAMFCQ; 23). A 2 x 2 multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that neither males nor females showed any preference for gender of hypothetical personal trainer (p > 0.05) although both males and females reported that a personal trainer of the opposite gender might make it harder to concentrate (p <0.05). Previous research has reported a preference for male coaches/strength and conditioning coaches from both male and female athletes. However, this study suggests that there is no such gender bias towards personal trainers in this population.

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 256

EP - 268

JO - International Journal of Exercise Science

JF - International Journal of Exercise Science

IS - 4

ER -