'Assessing the Cost and Co2e Impacts of Re-routeing UK Import Containers

Vasco Sanchez Rodrigues, Anthony Beresford, Stephen Pettit, Syamantak Bhattacharya, Irina Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Among the most important trade-related issues currently confronting the UK are the environmental implications of very large volumes of containerised freight being handled at a small number of ports while there appears to be significant potential for using other ports and water-rail intermodal connections. Six UK ports are selected for the analysis: Hull/ Immingham, Liverpool, Felixstowe, Southampton, Dover and Bristol. Through an origin destination analysis, the cost and CO2e impacts of UK port trade patterns are compared using the actual situation against three proposed Scenarios: (1) the re-direction of containers by a combined expansion of Hull and Immingham; Liverpool; and Bristol, (2) moving containers by rail facilitated via expanded capacity at Southampton, and (3) moving containers by rail through expanded capacity at Felixstowe. The research found that transporting containers from Felixstowe and Southampton to the northern regions by rail has the lowest CO2e impact, and is the most feasible option, although constraints exist in terms of infrastructure provision, water depth and rail network capacity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-67
JournalTransportation Research Part A: General
Volume61
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

import
Containers
Rails
costs
Costs
water
infrastructure
scenario
Water
Rail
Import
Container
Liverpool

Cite this

Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez ; Beresford, Anthony ; Pettit, Stephen ; Bhattacharya, Syamantak ; Harris, Irina. / 'Assessing the Cost and Co2e Impacts of Re-routeing UK Import Containers. In: Transportation Research Part A: General. 2014 ; Vol. 61. pp. 53-67.
@article{256fb03789a34f619e58c812d00328c7,
title = "'Assessing the Cost and Co2e Impacts of Re-routeing UK Import Containers",
abstract = "Among the most important trade-related issues currently confronting the UK are the environmental implications of very large volumes of containerised freight being handled at a small number of ports while there appears to be significant potential for using other ports and water-rail intermodal connections. Six UK ports are selected for the analysis: Hull/ Immingham, Liverpool, Felixstowe, Southampton, Dover and Bristol. Through an origin destination analysis, the cost and CO2e impacts of UK port trade patterns are compared using the actual situation against three proposed Scenarios: (1) the re-direction of containers by a combined expansion of Hull and Immingham; Liverpool; and Bristol, (2) moving containers by rail facilitated via expanded capacity at Southampton, and (3) moving containers by rail through expanded capacity at Felixstowe. The research found that transporting containers from Felixstowe and Southampton to the northern regions by rail has the lowest CO2e impact, and is the most feasible option, although constraints exist in terms of infrastructure provision, water depth and rail network capacity.",
author = "Rodrigues, {Vasco Sanchez} and Anthony Beresford and Stephen Pettit and Syamantak Bhattacharya and Irina Harris",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "53--67",
journal = "Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice",
issn = "0965-8564",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

'Assessing the Cost and Co2e Impacts of Re-routeing UK Import Containers. / Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez ; Beresford, Anthony; Pettit, Stephen; Bhattacharya, Syamantak; Harris, Irina.

In: Transportation Research Part A: General, Vol. 61, 2014, p. 53-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Assessing the Cost and Co2e Impacts of Re-routeing UK Import Containers

AU - Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez

AU - Beresford, Anthony

AU - Pettit, Stephen

AU - Bhattacharya, Syamantak

AU - Harris, Irina

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Among the most important trade-related issues currently confronting the UK are the environmental implications of very large volumes of containerised freight being handled at a small number of ports while there appears to be significant potential for using other ports and water-rail intermodal connections. Six UK ports are selected for the analysis: Hull/ Immingham, Liverpool, Felixstowe, Southampton, Dover and Bristol. Through an origin destination analysis, the cost and CO2e impacts of UK port trade patterns are compared using the actual situation against three proposed Scenarios: (1) the re-direction of containers by a combined expansion of Hull and Immingham; Liverpool; and Bristol, (2) moving containers by rail facilitated via expanded capacity at Southampton, and (3) moving containers by rail through expanded capacity at Felixstowe. The research found that transporting containers from Felixstowe and Southampton to the northern regions by rail has the lowest CO2e impact, and is the most feasible option, although constraints exist in terms of infrastructure provision, water depth and rail network capacity.

AB - Among the most important trade-related issues currently confronting the UK are the environmental implications of very large volumes of containerised freight being handled at a small number of ports while there appears to be significant potential for using other ports and water-rail intermodal connections. Six UK ports are selected for the analysis: Hull/ Immingham, Liverpool, Felixstowe, Southampton, Dover and Bristol. Through an origin destination analysis, the cost and CO2e impacts of UK port trade patterns are compared using the actual situation against three proposed Scenarios: (1) the re-direction of containers by a combined expansion of Hull and Immingham; Liverpool; and Bristol, (2) moving containers by rail facilitated via expanded capacity at Southampton, and (3) moving containers by rail through expanded capacity at Felixstowe. The research found that transporting containers from Felixstowe and Southampton to the northern regions by rail has the lowest CO2e impact, and is the most feasible option, although constraints exist in terms of infrastructure provision, water depth and rail network capacity.

U2 - 10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 53

EP - 67

JO - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

JF - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

SN - 0965-8564

ER -