Accuracy, precision and reliability in anthropometric surveys for ergonomics purposes in adult working populations: A literature review

Carlos Viviani, Pedro Arezes, Sara Braganca, Johan Molenbroek, Iman Dianat, Ignacio Castellucci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Anthropometric surveys are the most common method of gathering human morphometric data, used to design clothing, products and workspaces. The aim of this paper was to assess how current peer reviewed literature addresses the accuracy, reliability and precision regarding manual anthropometric surveys applied to adult working populations in the field of ergonomics. A literature review was performed in two electronic databases for finding relevant papers. A total of 312 papers were reviewed, of which 79 met the inclusion criteria. The results shown that the subjects of these publications are poorly addressed, so that only 27 studies mentioned at least one of the terms and none of the studies evaluated all of the terms. Only one paper mentioned and assessed precision and reliability of the measurement procedure. Furthermore, none of the publications evaluated accuracy. Moreover, the reviewed papers presented large differences in the factors that affect precision, reliability and accuracy. This was particularly clear in the measurer technique/training, measurement tools, subject posture and clothing. Researchers in this area should take more rigorous approaches and explicit indicators with their results should be presented in any report. Relevance for industry: It is important that scientific literature related to manual anthropometric measurements uses methods for assessing measurement error, since these data are often used to design clothing and workspaces as well as to calibrate non manual methods such as 3D scanners.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
Volume65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

Human Engineering
Ergonomics
clothing
Clothing
ergonomics
measurement procedure
Population
Publications
technical literature
Measurement errors
Literature
Posture
inclusion
electronics
Industry
Teaching
industry
Research Personnel
Databases
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Viviani, Carlos ; Arezes, Pedro ; Braganca, Sara ; Molenbroek, Johan ; Dianat, Iman ; Castellucci, Ignacio. / Accuracy, precision and reliability in anthropometric surveys for ergonomics purposes in adult working populations: A literature review. In: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2018 ; Vol. 65. pp. 1-16.
@article{8ebaa5e68c7d4b5b91507da4ac7a5cb0,
title = "Accuracy, precision and reliability in anthropometric surveys for ergonomics purposes in adult working populations: A literature review",
abstract = "Anthropometric surveys are the most common method of gathering human morphometric data, used to design clothing, products and workspaces. The aim of this paper was to assess how current peer reviewed literature addresses the accuracy, reliability and precision regarding manual anthropometric surveys applied to adult working populations in the field of ergonomics. A literature review was performed in two electronic databases for finding relevant papers. A total of 312 papers were reviewed, of which 79 met the inclusion criteria. The results shown that the subjects of these publications are poorly addressed, so that only 27 studies mentioned at least one of the terms and none of the studies evaluated all of the terms. Only one paper mentioned and assessed precision and reliability of the measurement procedure. Furthermore, none of the publications evaluated accuracy. Moreover, the reviewed papers presented large differences in the factors that affect precision, reliability and accuracy. This was particularly clear in the measurer technique/training, measurement tools, subject posture and clothing. Researchers in this area should take more rigorous approaches and explicit indicators with their results should be presented in any report. Relevance for industry: It is important that scientific literature related to manual anthropometric measurements uses methods for assessing measurement error, since these data are often used to design clothing and workspaces as well as to calibrate non manual methods such as 3D scanners.",
author = "Carlos Viviani and Pedro Arezes and Sara Braganca and Johan Molenbroek and Iman Dianat and Ignacio Castellucci",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ergon.2018.01.012",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics",
issn = "0169-8141",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Accuracy, precision and reliability in anthropometric surveys for ergonomics purposes in adult working populations: A literature review. / Viviani, Carlos; Arezes, Pedro; Braganca, Sara; Molenbroek, Johan; Dianat, Iman; Castellucci, Ignacio.

In: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 65, 01.05.2018, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy, precision and reliability in anthropometric surveys for ergonomics purposes in adult working populations: A literature review

AU - Viviani, Carlos

AU - Arezes, Pedro

AU - Braganca, Sara

AU - Molenbroek, Johan

AU - Dianat, Iman

AU - Castellucci, Ignacio

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Anthropometric surveys are the most common method of gathering human morphometric data, used to design clothing, products and workspaces. The aim of this paper was to assess how current peer reviewed literature addresses the accuracy, reliability and precision regarding manual anthropometric surveys applied to adult working populations in the field of ergonomics. A literature review was performed in two electronic databases for finding relevant papers. A total of 312 papers were reviewed, of which 79 met the inclusion criteria. The results shown that the subjects of these publications are poorly addressed, so that only 27 studies mentioned at least one of the terms and none of the studies evaluated all of the terms. Only one paper mentioned and assessed precision and reliability of the measurement procedure. Furthermore, none of the publications evaluated accuracy. Moreover, the reviewed papers presented large differences in the factors that affect precision, reliability and accuracy. This was particularly clear in the measurer technique/training, measurement tools, subject posture and clothing. Researchers in this area should take more rigorous approaches and explicit indicators with their results should be presented in any report. Relevance for industry: It is important that scientific literature related to manual anthropometric measurements uses methods for assessing measurement error, since these data are often used to design clothing and workspaces as well as to calibrate non manual methods such as 3D scanners.

AB - Anthropometric surveys are the most common method of gathering human morphometric data, used to design clothing, products and workspaces. The aim of this paper was to assess how current peer reviewed literature addresses the accuracy, reliability and precision regarding manual anthropometric surveys applied to adult working populations in the field of ergonomics. A literature review was performed in two electronic databases for finding relevant papers. A total of 312 papers were reviewed, of which 79 met the inclusion criteria. The results shown that the subjects of these publications are poorly addressed, so that only 27 studies mentioned at least one of the terms and none of the studies evaluated all of the terms. Only one paper mentioned and assessed precision and reliability of the measurement procedure. Furthermore, none of the publications evaluated accuracy. Moreover, the reviewed papers presented large differences in the factors that affect precision, reliability and accuracy. This was particularly clear in the measurer technique/training, measurement tools, subject posture and clothing. Researchers in this area should take more rigorous approaches and explicit indicators with their results should be presented in any report. Relevance for industry: It is important that scientific literature related to manual anthropometric measurements uses methods for assessing measurement error, since these data are often used to design clothing and workspaces as well as to calibrate non manual methods such as 3D scanners.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/accuracy-precision-reliability-anthropometric-surveys-ergonomics-purposes-adult-working-populations

U2 - 10.1016/j.ergon.2018.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ergon.2018.01.012

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

JF - International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

SN - 0169-8141

ER -