Acceptance Criteria for Clinical Effectiveness Pilot Trials (ACCEPT): Introducing a systematic approach for assessing pilot RCTs.

Georgina Charlesworth, Karen Burnell, Juanita Hoe, Ian Russell, Martin Orrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Conducting a pilot trial is important in preparing for, and justifying investment in, the ensuing larger trial. Pilot trials using the same design and methods as the subsequent main trial are ethically and financially advantageous especially when pilot and main trial data can be pooled. For explanatory trials in which internal validity is paramount, there is little room for variation of methods between the pilot and main trial. For pragmatic trials, where generalisability or external validity is key, greater flexibility is written into trial protocols to allow for ‘real life’ variation in procedures. We describe the development of a checklist for use in decision-making on whether pilot data can be carried forward to the main trial dataset without compromising trial integrity. We illustrate the use of the checklist using a pragmatic trial of psychosocial interventions for family carers of people with dementia as a case study.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume13
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Pragmatic Clinical Trials
Checklist
Clinical Protocols
Caregivers
Dementia
Decision Making

Cite this

@article{6a0c0fe5cac54396ad1b8ae3263d6f87,
title = "Acceptance Criteria for Clinical Effectiveness Pilot Trials (ACCEPT): Introducing a systematic approach for assessing pilot RCTs.",
abstract = "Conducting a pilot trial is important in preparing for, and justifying investment in, the ensuing larger trial. Pilot trials using the same design and methods as the subsequent main trial are ethically and financially advantageous especially when pilot and main trial data can be pooled. For explanatory trials in which internal validity is paramount, there is little room for variation of methods between the pilot and main trial. For pragmatic trials, where generalisability or external validity is key, greater flexibility is written into trial protocols to allow for ‘real life’ variation in procedures. We describe the development of a checklist for use in decision-making on whether pilot data can be carried forward to the main trial dataset without compromising trial integrity. We illustrate the use of the checklist using a pragmatic trial of psychosocial interventions for family carers of people with dementia as a case study.",
author = "Georgina Charlesworth and Karen Burnell and Juanita Hoe and Ian Russell and Martin Orrell",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

Acceptance Criteria for Clinical Effectiveness Pilot Trials (ACCEPT): Introducing a systematic approach for assessing pilot RCTs. / Charlesworth, Georgina; Burnell, Karen; Hoe, Juanita; Russell, Ian ; Orrell, Martin.

In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 13, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptance Criteria for Clinical Effectiveness Pilot Trials (ACCEPT): Introducing a systematic approach for assessing pilot RCTs.

AU - Charlesworth, Georgina

AU - Burnell, Karen

AU - Hoe, Juanita

AU - Russell, Ian

AU - Orrell, Martin

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Conducting a pilot trial is important in preparing for, and justifying investment in, the ensuing larger trial. Pilot trials using the same design and methods as the subsequent main trial are ethically and financially advantageous especially when pilot and main trial data can be pooled. For explanatory trials in which internal validity is paramount, there is little room for variation of methods between the pilot and main trial. For pragmatic trials, where generalisability or external validity is key, greater flexibility is written into trial protocols to allow for ‘real life’ variation in procedures. We describe the development of a checklist for use in decision-making on whether pilot data can be carried forward to the main trial dataset without compromising trial integrity. We illustrate the use of the checklist using a pragmatic trial of psychosocial interventions for family carers of people with dementia as a case study.

AB - Conducting a pilot trial is important in preparing for, and justifying investment in, the ensuing larger trial. Pilot trials using the same design and methods as the subsequent main trial are ethically and financially advantageous especially when pilot and main trial data can be pooled. For explanatory trials in which internal validity is paramount, there is little room for variation of methods between the pilot and main trial. For pragmatic trials, where generalisability or external validity is key, greater flexibility is written into trial protocols to allow for ‘real life’ variation in procedures. We describe the development of a checklist for use in decision-making on whether pilot data can be carried forward to the main trial dataset without compromising trial integrity. We illustrate the use of the checklist using a pragmatic trial of psychosocial interventions for family carers of people with dementia as a case study.

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

ER -