A transparency gap? the case of European Agricultural Committee governance

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    How much are European citizens entitled to know about the European Union's (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) governance system in general and the European Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committees (AACs) (Agricultural Advisory Groups since April 2004) in particular, and to what extent can EU institutions, the public, and committee members exercise scrutiny over the AACs? Two themes underlie these questions: access to information and scrutiny. These are intrinsic to the notion of transparency, which the article sets out to explore and comment on. It attempts to define the notion in relation to its essential components and in order to assess whether CAP governance through committees is transparent enough to ensure that citizens are ultimately able to exercise democratic control over it, this article gauges AAC intelligibility. Using original empirical research carried out in Autumn 2003, based on interviews with AAC members derived from socio-economic groups as well as European institutions' internal documentary evidence, the article argues that these structures suffer a substantial transparency deficit.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)239-258
    Number of pages20
    JournalPublic Policy and Administration
    Volume22
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2007

    Fingerprint

    agricultural policy
    transparency
    governance
    citizen
    European institution
    European Commission
    empirical research
    deficit
    Group
    interview
    evidence
    economics

    Cite this

    @article{0133c12cd37848ffad0ebc241107c7c9,
    title = "A transparency gap? the case of European Agricultural Committee governance",
    abstract = "How much are European citizens entitled to know about the European Union's (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) governance system in general and the European Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committees (AACs) (Agricultural Advisory Groups since April 2004) in particular, and to what extent can EU institutions, the public, and committee members exercise scrutiny over the AACs? Two themes underlie these questions: access to information and scrutiny. These are intrinsic to the notion of transparency, which the article sets out to explore and comment on. It attempts to define the notion in relation to its essential components and in order to assess whether CAP governance through committees is transparent enough to ensure that citizens are ultimately able to exercise democratic control over it, this article gauges AAC intelligibility. Using original empirical research carried out in Autumn 2003, based on interviews with AAC members derived from socio-economic groups as well as European institutions' internal documentary evidence, the article argues that these structures suffer a substantial transparency deficit.",
    author = "Karen Heard-Laureote",
    year = "2007",
    month = "4",
    doi = "10.1177/0952076707075905",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "239--258",
    journal = "Public Policy and Administration",
    issn = "0952-0767",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "2",

    }

    A transparency gap? the case of European Agricultural Committee governance. / Heard-Laureote, Karen.

    In: Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 22, No. 2, 04.2007, p. 239-258.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A transparency gap? the case of European Agricultural Committee governance

    AU - Heard-Laureote, Karen

    PY - 2007/4

    Y1 - 2007/4

    N2 - How much are European citizens entitled to know about the European Union's (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) governance system in general and the European Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committees (AACs) (Agricultural Advisory Groups since April 2004) in particular, and to what extent can EU institutions, the public, and committee members exercise scrutiny over the AACs? Two themes underlie these questions: access to information and scrutiny. These are intrinsic to the notion of transparency, which the article sets out to explore and comment on. It attempts to define the notion in relation to its essential components and in order to assess whether CAP governance through committees is transparent enough to ensure that citizens are ultimately able to exercise democratic control over it, this article gauges AAC intelligibility. Using original empirical research carried out in Autumn 2003, based on interviews with AAC members derived from socio-economic groups as well as European institutions' internal documentary evidence, the article argues that these structures suffer a substantial transparency deficit.

    AB - How much are European citizens entitled to know about the European Union's (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) governance system in general and the European Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committees (AACs) (Agricultural Advisory Groups since April 2004) in particular, and to what extent can EU institutions, the public, and committee members exercise scrutiny over the AACs? Two themes underlie these questions: access to information and scrutiny. These are intrinsic to the notion of transparency, which the article sets out to explore and comment on. It attempts to define the notion in relation to its essential components and in order to assess whether CAP governance through committees is transparent enough to ensure that citizens are ultimately able to exercise democratic control over it, this article gauges AAC intelligibility. Using original empirical research carried out in Autumn 2003, based on interviews with AAC members derived from socio-economic groups as well as European institutions' internal documentary evidence, the article argues that these structures suffer a substantial transparency deficit.

    U2 - 10.1177/0952076707075905

    DO - 10.1177/0952076707075905

    M3 - Article

    VL - 22

    SP - 239

    EP - 258

    JO - Public Policy and Administration

    JF - Public Policy and Administration

    SN - 0952-0767

    IS - 2

    ER -