A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability

Sara Braganca, Pedro Arezes, Miguel Carvalho, Susan Ashdown, Ignacio Castellucci, Celina Leão

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Collecting anthropometric data for real-life applications demands a high degree of precision and reliability. It is important to test new equipment that will be used for data collection OBJECTIVE:Compare two anthropometric data gathering techniques – manual methods and a Kinect-based 3D body scanner – to understand which of them gives more precise and reliable results. METHODS:The data was collected using a measuring tape and a Kinect-based 3D body scanner. It was evaluated in terms of precision by considering the regular and relative Technical Error of Measurement and in terms of reliability by using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Reliability Coefficient, Standard Error of Measurement and Coefficient of Variation. RESULTS:The results obtained showed that both methods presented better results for reliability than for precision. Both methods showed relatively good results for these two variables, however, manual methods had better results for some body measurements. CONCLUSION:Despite being considered sufficiently precise and reliable for certain applications (e.g. apparel industry), the 3D scanner tested showed, for almost every anthropometric measurement, a different result than the manual technique. Many companies design their products based on data obtained from 3D scanners, hence, understanding the precision and reliability of the equipment used is essential to obtain feasible results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-339
Number of pages15
JournalWork
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Reproducibility of Results
product design
Industry
Product design
Tapes
industry

Cite this

Braganca, S., Arezes, P., Carvalho, M., Ashdown, S., Castellucci, I., & Leão, C. (2018). A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability. Work, 59(3), 325-339. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182684
Braganca, Sara ; Arezes, Pedro ; Carvalho, Miguel ; Ashdown, Susan ; Castellucci, Ignacio ; Leão, Celina. / A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability. In: Work. 2018 ; Vol. 59, No. 3. pp. 325-339.
@article{2708ca3089e94944966a88579ba1f53b,
title = "A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:Collecting anthropometric data for real-life applications demands a high degree of precision and reliability. It is important to test new equipment that will be used for data collection OBJECTIVE:Compare two anthropometric data gathering techniques – manual methods and a Kinect-based 3D body scanner – to understand which of them gives more precise and reliable results. METHODS:The data was collected using a measuring tape and a Kinect-based 3D body scanner. It was evaluated in terms of precision by considering the regular and relative Technical Error of Measurement and in terms of reliability by using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Reliability Coefficient, Standard Error of Measurement and Coefficient of Variation. RESULTS:The results obtained showed that both methods presented better results for reliability than for precision. Both methods showed relatively good results for these two variables, however, manual methods had better results for some body measurements. CONCLUSION:Despite being considered sufficiently precise and reliable for certain applications (e.g. apparel industry), the 3D scanner tested showed, for almost every anthropometric measurement, a different result than the manual technique. Many companies design their products based on data obtained from 3D scanners, hence, understanding the precision and reliability of the equipment used is essential to obtain feasible results.",
author = "Sara Braganca and Pedro Arezes and Miguel Carvalho and Susan Ashdown and Ignacio Castellucci and Celina Le{\~a}o",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "6",
doi = "10.3233/WOR-182684",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "325--339",
journal = "Work",
issn = "1051-9815",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

Braganca, S, Arezes, P, Carvalho, M, Ashdown, S, Castellucci, I & Leão, C 2018, 'A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability' Work, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 325-339. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182684

A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability. / Braganca, Sara; Arezes, Pedro; Carvalho, Miguel; Ashdown, Susan; Castellucci, Ignacio; Leão, Celina.

In: Work, Vol. 59, No. 3, 06.04.2018, p. 325-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of manual anthropometric measurements with Kinect-based scanned measurements in terms of precision and reliability

AU - Braganca, Sara

AU - Arezes, Pedro

AU - Carvalho, Miguel

AU - Ashdown, Susan

AU - Castellucci, Ignacio

AU - Leão, Celina

PY - 2018/4/6

Y1 - 2018/4/6

N2 - BACKGROUND:Collecting anthropometric data for real-life applications demands a high degree of precision and reliability. It is important to test new equipment that will be used for data collection OBJECTIVE:Compare two anthropometric data gathering techniques – manual methods and a Kinect-based 3D body scanner – to understand which of them gives more precise and reliable results. METHODS:The data was collected using a measuring tape and a Kinect-based 3D body scanner. It was evaluated in terms of precision by considering the regular and relative Technical Error of Measurement and in terms of reliability by using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Reliability Coefficient, Standard Error of Measurement and Coefficient of Variation. RESULTS:The results obtained showed that both methods presented better results for reliability than for precision. Both methods showed relatively good results for these two variables, however, manual methods had better results for some body measurements. CONCLUSION:Despite being considered sufficiently precise and reliable for certain applications (e.g. apparel industry), the 3D scanner tested showed, for almost every anthropometric measurement, a different result than the manual technique. Many companies design their products based on data obtained from 3D scanners, hence, understanding the precision and reliability of the equipment used is essential to obtain feasible results.

AB - BACKGROUND:Collecting anthropometric data for real-life applications demands a high degree of precision and reliability. It is important to test new equipment that will be used for data collection OBJECTIVE:Compare two anthropometric data gathering techniques – manual methods and a Kinect-based 3D body scanner – to understand which of them gives more precise and reliable results. METHODS:The data was collected using a measuring tape and a Kinect-based 3D body scanner. It was evaluated in terms of precision by considering the regular and relative Technical Error of Measurement and in terms of reliability by using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Reliability Coefficient, Standard Error of Measurement and Coefficient of Variation. RESULTS:The results obtained showed that both methods presented better results for reliability than for precision. Both methods showed relatively good results for these two variables, however, manual methods had better results for some body measurements. CONCLUSION:Despite being considered sufficiently precise and reliable for certain applications (e.g. apparel industry), the 3D scanner tested showed, for almost every anthropometric measurement, a different result than the manual technique. Many companies design their products based on data obtained from 3D scanners, hence, understanding the precision and reliability of the equipment used is essential to obtain feasible results.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/comparison-manual-anthropometric-measurements-kinectbased-scanned-measurements-terms-precision-relia

U2 - 10.3233/WOR-182684

DO - 10.3233/WOR-182684

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 325

EP - 339

JO - Work

JF - Work

SN - 1051-9815

IS - 3

ER -